Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 07.01.2020 - 22365/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,22) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CAZAC AND SURCHICIAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2020 - 22365/10
An interference will contravene Article 8 unless it is "in accordance with the law", pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in paragraph 2, and furthermore is "necessary in a democratic society" in order to achieve the aim or aims (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 179, ECHR 2000-IV; and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 200, 22 May 2012). - EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23687/05
IVANTOC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2020 - 22365/10
As they did in Mozer (cited above, §§ 92-94), the Russian Government expressed the view that the approach to the issue of jurisdiction taken by the Court in Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII); Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012; and Ivan?£oc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011) was wrong and at variance with public international law. - EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03
IDALOV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2020 - 22365/10
An interference will contravene Article 8 unless it is "in accordance with the law", pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in paragraph 2, and furthermore is "necessary in a democratic society" in order to achieve the aim or aims (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 179, ECHR 2000-IV; and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 200, 22 May 2012).