Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16031) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GRYPAIOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (französisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Grypaios and Others v. Greece
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 37683/97
IAN EDGAR (LIVERPOOL) LIMITED contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
Hence, their complaint is about a speculative loss of income based on the assumption that their plots of land were not forestal and that they had the right to exploit them without any constraints (see Ian Edgar (Liverpool) Ltd v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37683/97, ECHR 2000-I). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 12286/08
TSOUKALAS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier cases (see Konti-Arvaniti v. Greece, no. 53401/99, §§ 29-30, 10 April 2003 and Tsoukalas v. Greece, no. 12286/08, §§ 37-43, 22 July 2010) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case.