Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 124/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16213) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DIACENCO v. ROMANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (no significant disadvantage) Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (applicability) Violation of Art. 6-2 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Diacenco v. Romania
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[FRE]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 124/04
- EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 124/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89
ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 124/04
Moreover, the scope of Article 6 § 2 is not limited to criminal proceedings that are pending (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, § 35). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79
Minelli ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 124/04
In certain instances, the Court has also found the provision applicable to judicial decisions taken after the discontinuation of such proceedings (see, in particular, Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, and Lutz, Englert and Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123), or following an acquittal (see Sekanina v. Austria, 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A; Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389/95, 21 March 2000; and Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923/95, 10 July 2001). - EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13126/87
SEKANINA c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 124/04
In certain instances, the Court has also found the provision applicable to judicial decisions taken after the discontinuation of such proceedings (see, in particular, Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, and Lutz, Englert and Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123), or following an acquittal (see Sekanina v. Austria, 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A; Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389/95, 21 March 2000; and Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923/95, 10 July 2001).