Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AL HAMDANI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 No violation of Art. 5-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Al Hamdani v. Bosnia and Herzegovina

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10
• EGMR, 08.10.2014 - 31098/10

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (14)

• EGMR, 01.07.1961 - 332/57

  LAWLESS c. IRLANDE (N° 3)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  It does no more than afford the Contracting States a means of preventing offences which are concrete and specific as regards, in particular, the place and time of their commission and their victims (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 102, Series A no. 3; M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04, § 89 and 102, 17 December 2009; and Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, § 54, 21 June 2011).

  Detention to prevent a person from committing an offence must, in addition, be "effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority" (see Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, § 14, Series A no. 3).

• EGMR, 04.01.2005 - 10513/03

  NAUMOV v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention does not apply to proceedings regulating a person's citizenship and/or the entry, stay and deportation of aliens, as such proceedings do not involve either the "determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him" within the meaning of the this Article of the Convention (see, among other authorities, S. v. Switzerland no. 13325/87, Commission decision of 15 December 1988, Decisions and Reports 59, p. 256, at p. 257; Soc v. Croatia (dec.), no. 47863/9, 29 June 2000; Naumov v. Albania (dec.), no. 10513/03, 4 January 2005; Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, §§ 36-40, ECHR 2000-x).
• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

  MELNIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  It was thus not raised early enough to allow an exchange of observations between the parties (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 61-63, 28 March 2006; Maznyak v. Ukraine, no. 27640/02, § 22, 31 January 2008; Kuncheva v. Bulgaria, no. 9161/02, § 18, 3 July 2008; Lisev v. Bulgaria, no. 30380/03, § 33, 26 February 2009; and Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria, no. 33726/03, § 24, 1 October 2009).

 
• EGMR, 18.10.2006 - 46410/99

  Rechtssache ÜNER gegen die NIEDERLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  The Court reiterates that as a matter of well-established international law and subject to its treaty obligations, including those arising from the Convention, a Contracting State has the right to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see, among many other authorities, Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII).
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 1948/04

  Somalia, Abschiebungshindernis, zielstaatsbezogene Abschiebungshindernisse, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  The right to asylum is not contained in either the Convention or its Protocols (Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 135, 11 January 2007).
• EGMR, 31.01.2008 - 27640/02

  MAZNYAK c. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  It was thus not raised early enough to allow an exchange of observations between the parties (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 61-63, 28 March 2006; Maznyak v. Ukraine, no. 27640/02, § 22, 31 January 2008; Kuncheva v. Bulgaria, no. 9161/02, § 18, 3 July 2008; Lisev v. Bulgaria, no. 30380/03, § 33, 26 February 2009; and Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria, no. 33726/03, § 24, 1 October 2009).
• EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 8320/04

  RYABIKIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that the deportation proceedings, although temporarily suspended pursuant to the request made by the Court, have nevertheless been in progress and are in strict compliance with domestic law (compare S.P. v. Belgium (dec.), no. 12572/08, 14 June 2011; contrast Ryabikin v. Russia, no. 8320/04, § 132, 19 June 2008, and Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, § 134, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 9161/02

  KOUNCHEVA c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  It was thus not raised early enough to allow an exchange of observations between the parties (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 61-63, 28 March 2006; Maznyak v. Ukraine, no. 27640/02, § 22, 31 January 2008; Kuncheva v. Bulgaria, no. 9161/02, § 18, 3 July 2008; Lisev v. Bulgaria, no. 30380/03, § 33, 26 February 2009; and Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria, no. 33726/03, § 24, 1 October 2009).
• EGMR, 26.02.2009 - 30380/03

  LISEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  It was thus not raised early enough to allow an exchange of observations between the parties (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 61-63, 28 March 2006; Maznyak v. Ukraine, no. 27640/02, § 22, 31 January 2008; Kuncheva v. Bulgaria, no. 9161/02, § 18, 3 July 2008; Lisev v. Bulgaria, no. 30380/03, § 33, 26 February 2009; and Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria, no. 33726/03, § 24, 1 October 2009).
• EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 30471/08

  ABDOLKHANI ET KARIMNIA c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 31098/10

  Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that the deportation proceedings, although temporarily suspended pursuant to the request made by the Court, have nevertheless been in progress and are in strict compliance with domestic law (compare S.P. v. Belgium (dec.), no. 12572/08, 14 June 2011; contrast Ryabikin v. Russia, no. 8320/04, § 132, 19 June 2008, and Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, § 134, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 33726/03

  TSONYO TSONEV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 12572/08

  S.P. c. BELGIQUE
• EKMR, 09.07.1988 - 13325/87

  S. c. Suisse
• EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84

  CIULLA v. ITALY