Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AL HUSIN v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 (in case of expulsion to Syria) Violation of Art. 5-1 No violation of Art. 5-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Al Husin v. Bosnia and Herzegovina

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08
• EGMR, 01.02.2017 - 3727/08

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 18.10.2006 - 46410/99

  Rechtssache ÜNER gegen die NIEDERLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  The Court reiterates that as a matter of well-established international law and subject to its treaty obligations, including those arising from the Convention, a Contracting State has the right to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see, among many other authorities, Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII).

  (see Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII).

• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 1948/04

  Somalia, Abschiebungshindernis, zielstaatsbezogene Abschiebungshindernisse, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  The right to asylum is not contained in either the Convention or its Protocols (Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 135, 11 January 2007).

  As correctly pointed out in the judgment, the right to asylum is not contained in either the Convention or its Protocols (Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 135, 11 January 2007).

• EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 8320/04

  RYABIKIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that the deportation proceedings, although temporarily suspended pursuant to the request made by the Court, have nevertheless been in progress since 1 February 2011 and in strict compliance with domestic law (compare S.P. v. Belgium (dec.), no. 12572/08, 14 June 2011; contrast Ryabikin v. Russia, no. 8320/04, § 132, 19 June 2008, and Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, § 134, ECHR 2009-...).

 
• EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 30471/08

  ABDOLKHANI ET KARIMNIA c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that the deportation proceedings, although temporarily suspended pursuant to the request made by the Court, have nevertheless been in progress since 1 February 2011 and in strict compliance with domestic law (compare S.P. v. Belgium (dec.), no. 12572/08, 14 June 2011; contrast Ryabikin v. Russia, no. 8320/04, § 132, 19 June 2008, and Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, § 134, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 12572/08

  S.P. c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that the deportation proceedings, although temporarily suspended pursuant to the request made by the Court, have nevertheless been in progress since 1 February 2011 and in strict compliance with domestic law (compare S.P. v. Belgium (dec.), no. 12572/08, 14 June 2011; contrast Ryabikin v. Russia, no. 8320/04, § 132, 19 June 2008, and Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, § 134, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84

  CIULLA v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  In his constitutional appeal, the applicant maintained that even if he indeed constituted a security threat, that factor would not be sufficient in itself to justify his detention (he relied on Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, Series A no. 3; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39; and Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  In his constitutional appeal, the applicant maintained that even if he indeed constituted a security threat, that factor would not be sufficient in itself to justify his detention (he relied on Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, Series A no. 3; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39; and Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148).
• EGMR, 01.07.1961 - 332/57

  LAWLESS c. IRLANDE (N° 3)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 3727/08

  In his constitutional appeal, the applicant maintained that even if he indeed constituted a security threat, that factor would not be sufficient in itself to justify his detention (he relied on Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, Series A no. 3; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39; and Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148).

• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 50027/08

  PETKOV AND PROFIROV v. BULGARIA

  Sub-paragraph (c) of Article 5 § 1 permits deprivation of liberty only in connection with criminal proceedings (see Al Husin v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 3727/08, § 65, 7 February 2012).