Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 36871/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14662) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GH IMMOBILIENMAKLER GMBH v. AUSTRIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 36871/11
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 5455/06
HALL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 36871/11
The applicant company's complaint relates to the length of the proceedings, which began on 1 September 2006, when the Vienna Municipality prohibited the construction of the buildings (see paragraph 7 above; and see Hall v. Austria, no. 5455/06, § 42, 6 March 2012, with further references), and ended on 7 April 2011, when the final decision of the Administrative Court was served on the applicant company's counsel (see paragraph 14 above). - EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 38314/06
GASSNER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 36871/11
Having regard to the above considerations and its case-law on the subject (see, mutatis mutandis, Birnleitner v. Austria (No. 2), no. 22601/09, § 17, 13 November 2014, and Gassner v. Austria, no. 38314/06, § 38, 11 December 2012), the Court is satisfied that in the particular circumstances of the case the reasonable time requirement under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention has been complied with. - EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 22601/09
BIRNLEITNER v. AUSTRIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 36871/11
Having regard to the above considerations and its case-law on the subject (see, mutatis mutandis, Birnleitner v. Austria (No. 2), no. 22601/09, § 17, 13 November 2014, and Gassner v. Austria, no. 38314/06, § 38, 11 December 2012), the Court is satisfied that in the particular circumstances of the case the reasonable time requirement under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention has been complied with.