Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,1514) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
M.B. AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA (No. 2)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
M.B. AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 28.05.2015 - 41107/10
Y. v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
In the present case, in which the first-instance acquittal was ultimately upheld by the court of appeal on 11 December 2020, more than eleven years and eight months after the events of 21 March 2009 (see also Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, § 99, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), the above observation applies all the more so since the applicants were minors at the time of the alleged ill-treatment (see M.B. and Others, cited above, § 82), the youngest applicant having been ten years and nine months of age and the oldest having been sixteen years and eight months of age. - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
However, it does not find it established that its level of severity and other relevant aspects were such as to amount to torture within the meaning of the Court's case-law (see, for example, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 97, ECHR 1999-V; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 114, ECHR 2000-VII; Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11, § 508, 24 July 2014; and Petrosyan v. Azerbaijan, no. 32427/16, § 68, 4 November 2021). - EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 28761/11
Polen zahlt Schmerzensgeld für Haft in CIA-Gefängnis
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
However, it does not find it established that its level of severity and other relevant aspects were such as to amount to torture within the meaning of the Court's case-law (see, for example, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 97, ECHR 1999-V; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 114, ECHR 2000-VII; Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11, § 508, 24 July 2014; and Petrosyan v. Azerbaijan, no. 32427/16, § 68, 4 November 2021).
- EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
The Court also reiterates that, in certain cases of alleged discrimination, it may require the respondent Government to disprove an arguable allegation of discrimination and, if they fail to do so, it may find a violation of Article 14 of the Convention on that basis (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 157, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 04.11.2021 - 32427/16
PETROSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
However, it does not find it established that its level of severity and other relevant aspects were such as to amount to torture within the meaning of the Court's case-law (see, for example, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 97, ECHR 1999-V; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 114, ECHR 2000-VII; Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11, § 508, 24 July 2014; and Petrosyan v. Azerbaijan, no. 32427/16, § 68, 4 November 2021). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
Even though such grounds are in themselves of an objective character, in view of the Contracting Parties' responsibility for the organisation of their judicial systems (see, mutatis mutandis, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 45, ECHR 2000-VII) the Court finds that the delays caused on those grounds in the present case are attributable to the respondent State. - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
However, it does not find it established that its level of severity and other relevant aspects were such as to amount to torture within the meaning of the Court's case-law (see, for example, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 97, ECHR 1999-V; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 114, ECHR 2000-VII; Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11, § 508, 24 July 2014; and Petrosyan v. Azerbaijan, no. 32427/16, § 68, 4 November 2021).
- EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 31975/19
KOVÁCOVÁ AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
These complaints fall to be examined under Article 3, alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention (see M.B. and Others v. Slovakia (no. 2), no. 63962/19, §§ 41, 77 and 94-97, 7 February 2023).