Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TRAJKOVSKI c. « L'EX-REPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACEDOINE »

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TRAJKOVSKI v. \

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TRAJKOVSKI v. \

  [MAC] Inadmissible

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.01.2001 - 53320/99
• EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 53320/99

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10522/83

  Mellacher u.a. ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 53320/99

  The Court will respect the legislature's judgment as to what is in the general interest unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundation (see the Mellacher and Others v. Austria judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 169, pp. 25-26, § 45).
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 53320/99

  Consequently, an interference must strike a fair balance between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see, among other authorities, the Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, § 69).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 53320/99

  From the critical date onwards all the State's acts and omissions not only must conform to the Convention bur are also undoubtedly subject to review by the Court (see the YaÄ?ci and Sargin v. Turkey judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, p. 16, § 40).

• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 60642/08

  ALISIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND

  Therefore, the Court will examine the present case, like other similar cases (see Trajkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 53320/99, ECHR 2002-IV, and Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912/02, 3 November 2009), under the third rule of this Article.
• EGMR, 17.10.2011 - 60642/08

  ALISIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND

  It is noted that the Court has already dealt with various aspects of the issue of "old" foreign-currency savings in the following cases: Trajkovski v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 53320/99, ECHR 2002-IV, concerning a Macedonian bank; Kovacic and Others, cited above, concerning the Zagreb branch of Ljubljanska Banka Ljubljana; Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912/02, 3 November 2009, concerning a Bosnian-Herzegovinian bank; and Molnar Gabor v. Serbia, no. 22762/05, 8 December 2009, concerning a Serbian bank).
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 17126/02

  LIKVIDEJAMA P/S SELGA AND VASILEVSKA v. LATVIA

  In these cases the Court has found that the successor States of the former SFRY had converted applicants" foreign-currency savings into public debts and examined the various aspects of settling such debts under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, for example, Trajkovski v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 53320/99, ECHR 2002-IV, and Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912/02, 3 November 2009).
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  SULJAGIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  In such circumstances, the present case falls to be examined under the third rule of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see also Trajkovski v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 53320/99, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 10968/04

  KECMAN v. SERBIA

  Therefore, the present case must be distinguished from the previous cases in which the respondent States had converted the applicants" foreign-currency savings into public debts and the Court's examination solely concerned the various aspects of settling such debts under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, in respect of "old" foreign-currency savings, Molnar Gabor, cited above, §§ 43-51; Trajkovski v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 53320/99, ECHR 2002-IV; and Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912/02, 3 November 2009); as regards deposits with Dafiment, see Ilic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 21811/09, 14 September 2010; Ribic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 16735/02, 14 December 2010; and Nikac v. Serbia (dec.), no. 17224/03, 17 May 2011).