Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,54695) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NAFIYE ÇETIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
The relevant domestic law and practice in force, at the time of the death of Harun Çetin, are outlined in the following judgments: Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey (no. 42942/02, § 45, 8 April 2008), and Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-99, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's procedural obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey, cited above, §§ 59-64, Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-98, ECHR 2007-..., Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, K.Ö. v. Turkey, no. 71795/01, § 43, 11 December 2007, Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, § 36, 17 July 2008, and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007). - EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
The relevant domestic law and practice in force, at the time of the death of Harun Çetin, are outlined in the following judgments: Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey (no. 42942/02, § 45, 8 April 2008), and Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-99, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
- EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39541/98
DÖLEK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's procedural obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey, cited above, §§ 59-64, Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-98, ECHR 2007-..., Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, K.Ö. v. Turkey, no. 71795/01, § 43, 11 December 2007, Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, § 36, 17 July 2008, and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007). - EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 71795/01
K.Ö. v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's procedural obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey, cited above, §§ 59-64, Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-98, ECHR 2007-..., Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, K.Ö. v. Turkey, no. 71795/01, § 43, 11 December 2007, Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, § 36, 17 July 2008, and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007). - EGMR, 08.04.2008 - 42942/02
ALI AND AYSE DURAN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
The relevant domestic law and practice in force, at the time of the death of Harun Çetin, are outlined in the following judgments: Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey (no. 42942/02, § 45, 8 April 2008), and Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-99, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)). - EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02
CAMDERELI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's procedural obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey, cited above, §§ 59-64, Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-98, ECHR 2007-..., Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, GC, no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, K.Ö. v. Turkey, no. 71795/01, § 43, 11 December 2007, Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, § 36, 17 July 2008, and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
- EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 19506/05
EBCIN c. TURQUIE
Or, les Hautes Parties contractantes se doivent de préserver la confiance du public dans la prééminence du droit et, pour ce faire, une procédure pénale doit avoir un effet dissuasif de nature à assurer la prévention efficace d'actes illégaux comme ceux dénoncés par la requérante (Beganovic, précité, §§ 85-87, Nafiye Çetin et autres c. Turquie, no 19180/03, §§ 37-42, 7 avril 2009, et Usta et autres c. Turquie, no 57084/00, §§ 66-69, 21 février 2008). - EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 49681/16
PERGAR v. CROATIA
Having regard to the Constitutional Court's decisions rendered as of 2019, which extensively implement the criteria established by the Court in assessing whether or not an investigation had been effective, including whether the authorities had acted with the required promptness and reasonable expedition (see, for instance, Nafiye Çetin and Others v. Turkey, no. 19180/03, § 42, 7 April 2009; and the Croatian Constitutional Court's decision U-IIIBi-4222/2018 of 5 November 2019 cited in Kusic and Others, § 55), the Court has no reason to doubt that the Constitutional Court will diligently examine the applicants' complaint.