Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 76800/01, 76801/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,62355) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96
Schießbefehl
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 76800/01
Moreover, it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], no. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 15.06.2004 - 40847/98
TAMMINEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 76800/01
The Court reiterates that, as a general rule, the assessment of the facts and the taking of evidence and its evaluation is a matter which necessarily comes within the appreciation of the national courts and cannot be reviewed by the Court unless there is an indication that the judges have drawn grossly unfair or arbitrary conclusions from the facts before them (mutatis mutandis, Tamminen v. Finland, no. 40847/98, § 38, 15 June 2004; García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 76800/01
Moreover, although the Convention obliges the courts to give reasons for their judgments, this obligation cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to any argument put forward (Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, § 61). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 76800/01
It does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf (Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, § 89; Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, § 33). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 76800/01
It does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf (Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, § 89; Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, § 33).