Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PANAYOTOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06

  SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  This may reflect on the extent and content of the positive obligations under Article 8, because racial discrimination - which includes discrimination on account of a person's actual or perceived ethnic origin - is a particularly invidious kind of discrimination and requires special vigilance on the part of the authorities (see Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, § 56, ECHR 2005-XII; D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 176, ECHR 2007-IV; and Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 43, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 32, ECHR 2005-X).
• EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 55762/00

  TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  This may reflect on the extent and content of the positive obligations under Article 8, because racial discrimination - which includes discrimination on account of a person's actual or perceived ethnic origin - is a particularly invidious kind of discrimination and requires special vigilance on the part of the authorities (see Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, § 56, ECHR 2005-XII; D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 176, ECHR 2007-IV; and Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 43, ECHR 2009).

 
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 17854/04

  SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  Since the issues thrown up by his complaints fully match with those raised by the other two applicants, respect for human rights does not require the continued examination of his complaints by reference to Article 37 § 1 in fine (see Shesti Mai Engineering OOD and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17854/04, § 62, 20 September 2011, with further references).
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00

  D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  This may reflect on the extent and content of the positive obligations under Article 8, because racial discrimination - which includes discrimination on account of a person's actual or perceived ethnic origin - is a particularly invidious kind of discrimination and requires special vigilance on the part of the authorities (see Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, § 56, ECHR 2005-XII; D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 176, ECHR 2007-IV; and Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 43, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 27753/06

  L.Z. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  On the first point, it should be noted at the outset that in this case the question whether Article 8 applies is indistinguishable from the question whether the applicants can claim to be victims of a breach of that provision (see, mutatis mutandis, L.Z. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 27753/06, § 69, 27 September 2011).