Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BOTMEH AND ALAMI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 27052/95

  JASPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 15187/03

  In contrast, no violation was found in Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95 or Fitt v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29777/96, both ECHR 2000-II, where the prosecution placed all material evidence which it intended to withhold before the trial judge, ex parte, for his ruling on disclosure.
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95

  ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 15187/03

  The hearing of the appeal was adjourned for reasons unconnected with the present application, and resumed almost a year later, on 16 October 2001, when the applicants repeated their submission that the present case was indistinguishable from Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, ECHR 2000-II (see paragraphs 37-38 below), and that, in order to comply with Article 6 of the Convention, the Court of Appeal was required either to quash the conviction or order full disclosure of all relevant evidence not seen by the trial judge.
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 29777/96

  FITT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 15187/03

  In contrast, no violation was found in Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95 or Fitt v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29777/96, both ECHR 2000-II, where the prosecution placed all material evidence which it intended to withhold before the trial judge, ex parte, for his ruling on disclosure.

 
• EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 40461/98

  LEWIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 15187/03

  The applicants were not represented during this hearing, either by their own counsel or by a specially appointed, security-cleared, counsel (see Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2004-X).
• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 39482/98

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (rechtliches Gehör; Waffengleichheit; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 15187/03

  In Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, no. 39482/98, ECHR 2003-VII, the prosecution on its own initiative decided not to disclose material evidence to the defence at trial.
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 15187/03

  The Court recalls that the guarantees in paragraph 3 of Article 6 are specific aspects of the right to a fair trial set out in paragraph 1 (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 November 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 33).

• EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 3455/05

  A. u. a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  There will not be a fair trial, however, unless any difficulties caused to the defendant by a limitation on his rights are sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the judicial authorities (see, for example, Doorson v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports 1996-II; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 23 April 1997, § 58, Reports 1997-III; Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-II; S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom, no. 15187/03, judgment of 7 June 2007, § 37).
• EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 18757/06

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (Abgrenzung der unzulässigen Tatprovokation von …

  There will not be a fair trial, however, unless any difficulties caused to the defendant by a limitation on his rights are sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the judicial authorities (see, for example, Doorson v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports 1996-II; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 58, Reports 1997-III; Jasper v. the United Kingdom (GC), no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-II; S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom, no. 15187/03, § 37, 7 June 2007; and A. and Others v. the United Kingdom (GC), no. 3455/05, §§ 205 et seq., ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 6228/09

  LAGUTIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  There will not be a fair trial, however, unless any difficulties caused to the defendant by a limitation on his rights are sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the judicial authorities (see, for example, Doorson v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports 1996-II; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 58, Reports 1997-III; Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-II; S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom, no. 15187/03, § 37, 7 June 2007; A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, §§ 205 et seq., ECHR 2009-...; and Leas v. Estonia, no. 59577/08, §§ 76 et seq., 6 March 2012).

 
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 6293/04

  MIRILASHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Cela étant, la Cour fait observer que, à chaque fois qu'elle a conclu à la non-violation de l'article 6 de la Convention par le Royaume-Uni dans des affaires où des éléments de preuve n'avaient pas été divulgués, elle a soigneusement examiné l'état de la législation et de la pratique britanniques en la matière (voir l'aperçu qu'elle en a récemment donné dans l'affaire Botmeh et Alami c. Royaume-Uni, no 15187/03, §§ 20 et suiv., 7 juin 2007 ; voir aussi Fitt c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 29777/96, §§ 30-33, CEDH 2000-II).
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 72/17

  ATILLA TAS c. TURQUIE

  Toutes difficultés causées à la défense par une limitation des droits de l'accusé doivent être suffisamment compensées 17. Conformément à la troisième étape de l'approche développée dans l'affaire A. et autres c. Royaume-Uni, si l'on veut garantir un procès équitable à l'accusé, toutes difficultés causées à la défense par une limitation de ses droits doivent être suffisamment compensées par la procédure suivie devant les autorités judiciaires (voir, par exemple, Doorson c. Pays-Bas, 26 mars 1996, § 70, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-II, Van Mechelen et autres c. Pays-Bas, 23 avril 1997, § 58, Recueil 1997-III, Jasper c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 27052/95, §§ 51-53, 16 février 2000, S.N. c. Suède, no 34209/96, § 47, CEDH 2002-V, Botmeh et Alami c. Royaume-Uni, no 15187/03, § 37, 7 juin 2007, et A. et autres c. Royaume-Uni, précité, § 205).
• EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 40/14

  AUSTIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  39647/98 and 40461/98, ECHR 2004-X, Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom, no. 15187/03, 7 June 2007, Atlan v. the United Kingdom, no. 36533/97, 19 June 2001 and Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, no. 39482/98, ECHR 2003-VII).