Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 12278/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,69093) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PADALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 194/02
NIKOLOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 51362/99
ENEVA AND DOBREV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 53367/99
STOYANOVA AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99
TODOROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 12278/03
The Court also reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 75115/01
MOHYLOVÁ c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 12278/03
The Court recalls that it has already dealt with the question of the annulment of contracts of sale under which applicants bought property that previously had been nationalised during the communist regime (see Panikian v. Bulgaria, no. 29583/96, Commission decision of 10 July 1997; Pincová and Pinc v. the Czech Republic, no. 36548/97, ECHR 2002-VIII; Becvár and Becvárová v. the Czech Republic, no. 58358/00, 14 December 2004; Mohylová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 75115/01, 6 September 2005; and Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10522/83
Mellacher u.a. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 12278/03
It is not for the Court to say whether the legislation represented the best solution, provided that the authorities remain within the bounds of that margin (see, mutatis mutandis, Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 53, Series A no. 169). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 12278/03
The Court must next determine whether a fair balance was struck between the general interests of the community and the individual's fundamental rights (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 38, Series A no. 332).
- EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 17467/07
PAUKSTIS v. LITHUANIA
Nothing in the case-file indicates that either the municipal authorities or M.P. acted in bad faith by, respectively, transferring or acquiring that plot (see Padalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 12278/03, § 68, 7 July 2009).