Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10, 13927/11, 46187/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,16304
EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10, 13927/11, 46187/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,16304)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.07.2015 - 72287/10, 13927/11, 46187/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,16304)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Juli 2015 - 72287/10, 13927/11, 46187/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,16304)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,16304) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Respondent State to take ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Respondent State to take ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (71)Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

  • EGMR, 28.04.2008 - 35014/97

    HUTTEN-CZAPSKA c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    In order to facilitate effective implementation of its judgments along these lines, the Court may adopt a pilot-judgment procedure allowing it to clearly identify in a judgment the existence of structural problems underlying the violations and to indicate specific measures or actions to be taken by the respondent State to remedy them (see Broniowski, cited above, §§ 189-94 and the operative part and Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014/97, §§ 231-39 and the operative part, ECHR 2006-VIII).

    This adjudicative approach is, however, pursued with due respect for the Convention organs" respective functions: it falls to the Committee of Ministers to evaluate the implementation of individual and general measures under Article 46 § 2 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Broniowski v. Poland (friendly settlement) [GC], no. 31443/96, § 42, ECHR 2005-IX and Hutten-Czapska v. Poland (friendly settlement) [GC], no. 35014/97, § 42, 28 April 2008).

  • EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 24240/07

    ÜMMÜHAN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    The relevant principles, as established in Kudla and the Court's subsequent judgments, has been set out as follows (see, among other authorities, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89, ECHR 2006-V); Sürmeli v. Germany ([GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII, with further references; Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece, no. 50973/08, § 55, 21 December 2010; Finger, cited above, § 83; and Ümmühan Kaplan v. Turkey, no. 24240/07, § 72, 20 March 2012).

    In certain situations the adjournment was linked with the recent introduction of a new domestic remedy (see Ümmühan Kaplan v. Turkey, no. 24240/07, §§ 76-77, 20 March 2012.

  • EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 40150/09

    GLYKANTZI c. GRÈCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    60041/08 and 60054/08, § 106, ECHR 2010 (extracts); Glykantzi v. Greece, no. 40150/09, § 62, 30 October 2012; and Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos.

    In some judgments, the Court adjourned consideration of the remaining applications, new and communicated ones alike, pending the introduction of an effective domestic remedy, as required by Article 13, for unreasonable length of proceedings and the adoption of general measures providing redress to all the persons affected in respect of violations already suffered (see, for instance, Glykantzi v. Greece, no. 40150/09, §§ 82-83, 30 October 2012; and Michelioudakis v. Greece, no. 54447/10, §§ 79-80, 3 April 2012).

     
  • EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

    Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    The relevant principles, as established in Kudla and the Court's subsequent judgments, has been set out as follows (see, among other authorities, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89, ECHR 2006-V); Sürmeli v. Germany ([GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII, with further references; Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece, no. 50973/08, § 55, 21 December 2010; Finger, cited above, § 83; and Ümmühan Kaplan v. Turkey, no. 24240/07, § 72, 20 March 2012).
  • EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99

    E.G. c. POLOGNE ET 175 AUTRES AFFAIRES DE LA RIVIÈRE BOUG

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    Indeed, the Court's task, as defined by Article 19, that is to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto", is not necessarily best achieved by repeating the same findings in a large series of cases (see, mutatis mutandis, E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 27, ECHR 2008).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

    SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by resolving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see, among other examples, Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192-193, ECHR 2004-V; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 125, ECHR 2009; Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom, nos.
  • EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 38064/97

    TURCZANIK v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    Contrary to the Court's established case-law on the assessment of the reasonableness of the length of proceedings (see, among many other examples, Kudla, cited above, § 119-124; Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, §§ 58-60, 15 October 1999; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2005-VI; Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, § 67-71, 1 February 2005; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 28 and 33, 28 March 2006; and, in particular, Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 35, 11 October 2005), the courts did not examine the overall length of the proceedings but only selected parts of them.
  • EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 52495/99

    KOSS v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    Contrary to the Court's established case-law on the assessment of the reasonableness of the length of proceedings (see, among many other examples, Kudla, cited above, § 119-124; Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, §§ 58-60, 15 October 1999; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2005-VI; Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, § 67-71, 1 February 2005; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 28 and 33, 28 March 2006; and, in particular, Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 35, 11 October 2005), the courts did not examine the overall length of the proceedings but only selected parts of them.
  • EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99

    WOLKENBERG AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    The object of the pilot-judgment procedure is to facilitate the speediest and most effective resolution of a dysfunction affecting the protection of the Convention rights in question in the national legal order (see Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, 4 December 2007).
  • EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 60041/08

    GREENS ET M.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
    60041/08 and 60054/08, § 106, ECHR 2010 (extracts); Glykantzi v. Greece, no. 40150/09, § 62, 30 October 2012; and Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos.
  • EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 43517/09

    TORREGGIANI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  • EGMR - 57875/09 (anhängig)

    [FRE]

  • EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 51837/99

    BELLER v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99

    MAJEWSKI v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 15.10.1999 - 26614/95

    HUMEN c. POLOGNE

  • EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 61467/12

    REZMIVES ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    L'État doit également appliquer ces mesures à l'égard des autres personnes se trouvant dans la même situation que le requérant, l'objectif pour lui devant être de résoudre les problèmes qui ont conduit la Cour à son constat de violation (voir, parmi d'autres, Rutkowski et autres c. Pologne, nos 72287/10 et al., § 200, 7 juillet 2015 ; Alisic et autres c. Bosnie-Herzégovine, Croatie, Serbie, Slovénie et l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine [GC], no 60642/08, § 142, CEDH 2014 ; Torreggiani et autres, précité, § 83 ; Broniowski c. Pologne, [GC], no 31443/96, §§ 192-193, CEDH 2004-V et les références qui y sont citées).
  • EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 32837/20

    PALICCY AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    72287/10 and 2 others, 7 July 2015, the Court already found a violation of Article 6 of the Convention in relation to the length of judicial proceedings.
  • EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 18706/22

    PARADOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    72287/10 and 2 others, 7 July 2015, the Court already found a violation of Article 6 of the Convention in relation to the length of judicial proceedings.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht