Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35019/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,28306) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUDESCHER v. AUSTRIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35019/97
- EGMR, 20.12.2001 - 35019/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35019/97
Moreover, as a general rule, the assessment of the facts is within the province of the national courts (see the Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, pp. 19-20, § 60). - EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75
ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35019/97
The Court further reiterates that under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention it is necessary that, in the determination of "civil rights and obligations", decisions taken by administrative authorities which do not themselves satisfy the requirements of that Article - as is the case in this instance with the district authority and the regional government - be subject to subsequent control by a "judicial body that has full jurisdiction" (see the Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, § 29; the Ortenberg v. Austria judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, pp. 49-50, § 31; and the Fischer v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 17, § 28). - EGMR, 25.11.1994 - 12884/87
ORTENBERG c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35019/97
The Court further reiterates that under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention it is necessary that, in the determination of "civil rights and obligations", decisions taken by administrative authorities which do not themselves satisfy the requirements of that Article - as is the case in this instance with the district authority and the regional government - be subject to subsequent control by a "judicial body that has full jurisdiction" (see the Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, § 29; the Ortenberg v. Austria judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, pp. 49-50, § 31; and the Fischer v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 17, § 28). - EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90
FISCHER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35019/97
The Court further reiterates that under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention it is necessary that, in the determination of "civil rights and obligations", decisions taken by administrative authorities which do not themselves satisfy the requirements of that Article - as is the case in this instance with the district authority and the regional government - be subject to subsequent control by a "judicial body that has full jurisdiction" (see the Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, § 29; the Ortenberg v. Austria judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, pp. 49-50, § 31; and the Fischer v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 17, § 28).