Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35848/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,38439) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35848/97
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 35848/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35848/97
In this regard, the Court recalls its case-law in the B. v. Austria judgment of 28 March 1990 (Series A no. 175, pp. 14-16, §§ 35-39), by which it may examine under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention the length of the applicant's detention between 19 May 1994 and 7 November 1997, i.e. from the moment when the applicant was remanded in custody until the delivery of the Plzen Regional Court's judgment. - EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14838/89
A. v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35848/97
Moreover, an applicant who has exhausted a remedy that is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required to have tried others which were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see, mutatis mutandis, the A. v. France judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-B, p. 48, § 32). - EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62
Stögmüller ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 35848/97
To the extent that the applicant complains of the reasons for which he was remanded in custody, the Court recalls that Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention authorises arrest or detention simply for the purpose of bringing the person concerned "before the competent legal authority" on the basis of a "reasonable suspicion" that he or she "has committed an offence", the persistence of that suspicion being a condition for the validity of any continued detention (see the Stögmuller v. Austria judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, p. 40, § 4; the Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, p. 29, §§ 51-53).