Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GANUSAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 25.10.1990 - 11787/85

  THYNNE, WILSON AND GUNNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 47922/99

  Nothing indicates that the causal link between the conviction and the re-detention was broken (see, by contrast, the Weeks v. the United Kingdom judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 145-A; the Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190-A; the Hussain v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I; the Singh v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1996, Reports 1996-I).
• EGMR, 05.10.1988 - 9787/82

  WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 47922/99

  Nothing indicates that the causal link between the conviction and the re-detention was broken (see, by contrast, the Weeks v. the United Kingdom judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 145-A; the Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190-A; the Hussain v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I; the Singh v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1996, Reports 1996-I).
• EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77

  VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 47922/99

  A penalty involving deprivation of liberty which the offender must undergo for a period specified in the court decision is justified at the outset by the original conviction and appeal proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, the Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium judgment of 24 June 1982, Series A no. 50, pp. 21-22, §§ 39-40).

• EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 18233/16

  ETUTE c. LUXEMBOURG

  For instance, in the important case of Ganusauskas v. Lithuania ((dec.), no. 47922/99, 7 September 1999), the Court dealt with the applicant's "renewed" imprisonment.
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 13546/06

  MOISEYENKO v. RUSSIA

  There is nothing to indicate that the causal link between the conviction and the re-detention was broken (see Ganusauskas v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 47922/99, 7 September 1999, with further references).