Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.09.2010 - 38162/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,61700) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MELNYK v. UKRAINE (II)
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.2010 - 38162/04
While the applicant could have understandably been frustrated by the low amount of the award, his mere hope to receive more generous compensation cannot be considered as a "legitimate expectation" since it was based neither on any legal provision nor on domestic case-law (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 31, Series A no. 332). - EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98
GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.09.2010 - 38162/04
"Possessions" can either be "existing possessions" or assets, including claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he or she has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining the effective enjoyment of a property right (see, for example, Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002-VII).