Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAYA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Pecuniary ...

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  The Court reiterates its earlier findings in a number of cases that the investigation carried out by the administrative councils cannot be regarded as independent since they are chaired by the governors or their deputies, and composed of local representatives of the executive, who are hierarchically dependent on the governor, an executive officer linked to the very security forces under investigation (see, inter alia, Ipek v. Turkey, no. 25764/94, § 174, 17 February 2004; Talat Tepe, cited above, § 84; OÄ?ur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 91, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, p. 12, § 32).
• EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

  OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  It is clear from this case-law that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to lawful demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct and the safety of all citizens (see Balçık and Others, cited above, § 46; Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-....).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Further, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

  Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, p. 12, § 32).

• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 37273/10

  SÜLEYMAN ÇELEBI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Bref, il n'existe aucun élément ou commencement de preuve susceptible d'étayer leurs allégations selon lesquelles ils ont subi des traitements contraires à l'article 3 (Oya Ataman c. Turquie, no 74552/01, § 26, CEDH 2006-XIII, Saya et autres c. Turquie, no 4327/02, § 15, 7 octobre 2008, et Aytas et autres c. Turquie, no 6758/05, § 14, 8 décembre 2009).
• EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 20792/07

  GÜLER c. TURQUIE

  En particulier, il n'a fourni aucun rapport médical allant dans ce sens (voir, entre autres, Kılıçgedik c. Turquie (déc.), no 55982/00, 1er juin 2004, Saya et autres c. Turquie, no 4327/02, § 15, 7 octobre 2008, Karatepe et autres c. Turquie, nos 33112/04, 36110/04, 40190/04, 41469/04, 41471/04 et 41551/98, § 20, 7 avril 2009, et Aytas et autres c. Turquie, no 6758/05, § 14, 8 décembre 2009).
• EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 43279/04

  ERSOY c. TURQUIE

  Dans ce contexte, sans approfondir son examen, la Cour rappelle qu'elle a déjà jugé dans plusieurs affaires que les enquêtes menées par la préfecture suscitaient de sérieux doutes, en ce qu'elles étaient conduites par des personnes qui n'étaient pas indépendantes de l'exécutif (Kılıç c. Turquie, no 22492/93, § 72, CEDH 2000-III ; Satık et autres c. Turquie, no 31866/96, § 60, 10 octobre 2000 ; Ä°hsan Bilgin c. Turquie, précité, § 72 ; Kamer Demir et autres c. Turquie, no 41335/98, § 49, 19 octobre 2006 ; et Saya et autres c. Turquie, no 4327/02, § 27, 7 octobre 2008).
• EGMR - 75926/17 (anhängig)

  VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA

  (b) was the recourse to physical force made strictly necessary by the applicant's own conduct (see Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, §§ 32-33, 29 November 2007; Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 21, 7 October 2008; Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 133, 2 April 2009; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 49, 17 April 2012)?.