Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,64256
EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01 (https://dejure.org/2010,64256)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.10.2010 - 69180/01 (https://dejure.org/2010,64256)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Oktober 2010 - 69180/01 (https://dejure.org/2010,64256)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64256) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KARANDJA v. BULGARIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01
    The general principles governing such situations have been summarised in paragraphs 93-97 of the Court's judgment in Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria ([GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, ECHR 2005-VII).
  • EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 7888/03

    NIKOLOVA AND VELICHKOVA v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01
    This may, in appropriate cases, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, § 125 in limine, ECHR 2007-IX, and Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 82 in limine, 20 December 2007).
  • EGMR, 29.05.2008 - 1839/04

    SANGARIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01
    Various eventualities, such as unemployment or incapacity to work, have not been taken into account (see Sangariyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 1839/04, § 128, 29 May 2008), nor has the applicant presented an actuarial report.
  • EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 51210/99

    NEHYET GÜNAY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01
    However, there is no evidence as to Mr Karandja's actual income, if any (see Nehyet Günay and Others v. Turkey, no. 51210/99, § 122, 21 October 2008), and the method used by the applicant to calculate the loss of financial support is far from precise.
  • EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 27866/03

    BEKER v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01
    In those circumstances, the Court sees no reason to doubt the existence of a sufficient causal link between the breach of Article 2 and the applicant's loss of financial support (see Nachova and Others, cited above, § 171, and Beker v. Turkey, no. 27866/03, § 62, 24 March 2009).
  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

    Minelli ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01
    It is not the Court's role to question the correctness of that interpretation; it must base its examination on the provisions of the domestic law as they were applied by the national authorities (see, mutatis mutandis, Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 35, Series A no. 62, and Vasilescu v. Romania, 22 May 1998, § 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III).
  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 77938/11

    DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    The Court notes, however, that this is not the first case against Bulgaria in which it finds that the procedural response to a death at the hands of the police has failed to meet the Convention standards (see Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, §§ 77-84, ECHR 2000-VI; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 141-46, ECHR 2002-IV; Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, §§ 108-16, 23 February 2006; Karandja v. Bulgaria, no. 69180/01, §§ 64-68, 7 October 2010; Dimov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 30086/05, §§ 83-85, 6 November 2012; and Filipovi, cited above, §§ 64-73) It should be emphasised that appropriate procedures for ensuring the accountability of agents of the State are indispensable in maintaining public confidence and meeting the legitimate concerns that might arise from the use of force.
  • EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05

    DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    Unlike previous cases against Bulgaria in which the Court found that the rules governing the use of force for the arrest of unarmed and non-dangerous individuals were deficient in that they allowed the police to use firearms against them (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 99-102, ECHR 2005-VII; Tzekov, cited above, §§ 53-56; Vasil Sashov Petrov v. Bulgaria, no. 63106/00, §§ 43-47, 10 June 2010; and Karandja v. Bulgaria, no. 69180/01, §§ 56-60, 7 October 2010), the present case concerns an armed and dangerous individual who was using firearms against the police.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht