Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 10763/06, 12346/06, 20442/06, 22664/06, 26836/06, 3662/07, 3876/07, 15188/07, 18150/07, 33181/07, 34110/07, 60004/11, 63971/11, 77032/11, 2118/12, 19706/12, 20006/12, 21620/12, 35753/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 10763/06, 12346/06, 20442/06, 22664/06, 26836/06, 3662/07, 3876/07, 15188/07, 18150/07, 33181/07, 34110/07, 60004/11, 63971/11, 77032/11, 2118/12, 19706/12, 20006/12, 21620/12, 35753/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,32069)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.10.2014 - 10763/06, 12346/06, 20442/06, 22664/06, 26836/06, 3662/07, 3876/07, 15188/07, 18150/07, 33181/07, 34110/07, 60004/11, 63971/11, 77032/11, 2118/12, 19706/12, 20006/12, 21620/12, 35753/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,32069)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Oktober 2014 - 10763/06, 12346/06, 20442/06, 22664/06, 26836/06, 3662/07, 3876/07, 15188/07, 18150/07, 33181/07, 34110/07, 60004/11, 63971/11, 77032/11, 2118/12, 19706/12, 20006/12, 21620/12, 35753/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,32069)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,32069) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZAGRADSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Art. 3, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 10763/06
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declarations in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 10763/06
Even if the method of calculation employed by the Russian authorities in respect of the conditions-of-detention complaints did not correspond exactly to the guidelines established by the Court in the pilot judgment (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 172, 10 January 2012), what is important is that the proposed sums are not unreasonable in comparison with the awards made by the Court in similar cases (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 105, ECHR 2006-V).