Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 45435/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,33823) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RADOS AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to eleven sets of proceedings No violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to two sets of proceedings No violation of Art. 13 with regard to pending proceedings Violation of Art. 13 with ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 31.08.2000 - 45435/99
- EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 45435/99
- EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 45435/99
- EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 45435/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 45435/99
In the light of the criteria laid down in its case-law (see, inter alia, the Humen v. Poland [GC], no 26614/95, 15 October 1999, § 60, unpublished, and Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV) and having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the Court considers that the length of the above proceedings failed to satisfy the reasonable time requirement. - EGMR, 09.12.2015 - 30210/96
KUDLA ET 204 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 45435/99
The Court reiterates that in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had, however, to the state of the case on 5 November 1997 (see, among other authorities, Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII).