Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,30256) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PICHKUR v. UKRAINE
Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Six month period) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Pichkur v. Ukraine
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 10441/06
- EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
- EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 10441/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02
E.B. v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
It is necessary but it is also sufficient for the facts of the case to fall "within the ambit" of one or more of the Convention Articles (see, among other authorities, Gaygusuz v. Austria, § 36, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, and E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 47, ECHR 2008-... and references therein). - EGMR, 09.06.1988 - 9840/82
B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
The Court notes that in this situation pecuniary damage does not lend itself to a precise calculation, and therefore it is appropriate to make a global assessment of his pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage (B. v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 9 June 1988, §§ 10-12, Series A no. 136-D, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 40, Series A no. 274, and Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
The Court notes that in this situation pecuniary damage does not lend itself to a precise calculation, and therefore it is appropriate to make a global assessment of his pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage (B. v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 9 June 1988, §§ 10-12, Series A no. 136-D, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 40, Series A no. 274, and Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01
STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
65731/01 and 65900/01, § 40, ECHR 2005-X). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
The Court notes that in this situation pecuniary damage does not lend itself to a precise calculation, and therefore it is appropriate to make a global assessment of his pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage (B. v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 9 June 1988, §§ 10-12, Series A no. 136-D, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 40, Series A no. 274, and Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97
WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
The Court's case-law establishes that discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06
The Court has frequently reiterated that the Convention is a living instrument which must be interpreted "in the light of present-day conditions" (see Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 31, Series A no. 26).