Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  K.I. v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Tajikistan);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article ...

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 17239/13

  MAMAZHONOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

  The relevant general principles concerning the application of Article 3 have been summarised recently by the Court in the judgment in F.G. v. Sweden ([GC], no. 43611/11, § 111-27, ECHR 2016) and in the context of removals from Russia to Central Asian states in Mamazhonov v. Russia (no.17239/13, §§ 127-35, 23 October 2014).
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 11209/10

  RUSTAMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

  To avoid being arbitrary, detention under Article 5 § 1 (f) must be carried out in good faith; it must be closely connected to the grounds of detention relied on by the Government, the place and conditions of detention must be appropriate, and the length of the detention must not exceed that reasonably required for the purpose pursued (see Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no.13229/03, § 74, ECHR 2008, and Rustamov v. Russia, no.11209/10, § 150, 3 July 2012, with further references).
• EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10

  SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).

• VG Potsdam, 05.03.2021 - 15 K 5680/17

  Kenia: keine Verfolgung Homosexueller; interne Fluchtmöglichkeiten; Sicherung des …

  In Betracht kommt die Verletzung von Art. 3 EMRK, wenn der Kläger im Falle seiner Abschiebung nach Kenia der ernsthaften Gefahr ("real risk") der Todesstrafe, der Folter oder der unmenschlichen oder erniedrigenden Be handlung oder Bestrafung ausgesetzt wäre (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 23. März 2016, F.G./Schweden, Nr. 43611/11, Rn. 111 ff.; zuletzt bestätigt mit Urteil vom 7. November 2017 K.I./Russland, Nr. 58182/14, Rn. 31).
• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 55978/20

  T.K. AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

  In particular, K.I. v. Russia (no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017) concerned an individual who had been accused of politically and religiously motivated crimes and in respect of whom the Tajik authorities had issued an international search and arrest warrant - by contrast with the applicants in the present case.
• VG Potsdam, 21.01.2022 - 15 K 2877/18

  Kenia: Bandenkriminalität kein asylrelevanter Verfolgungsgrund, Ernsthafter …

  In Betracht kommt die Verletzung von Art. 3 EMRK, wenn der Kläger im Falle seiner Abschiebung nach Kenia der ernsthaften Gefahr ("real risk") der Todesstrafe, der Folter oder der unmenschlichen oder erniedrigenden Behandlung oder Bestrafung ausgesetzt wäre (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 23. März 2016, F.G./Schweden, Nr. 43611/11, Rn. 111 ff.; Urteil vom 7. November 2017 K.l./Russland, Nr. 58182/14, Rn. 31).

 
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 45761/18

  N.K. v. RUSSIA

  In so far as the applicant's complaint concerned the risk of ill-treatment that he ran in Tajikistan, the present case is identical to cases in which the Court previously established that individuals whose extradition was sought by Tajik authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted a vulnerable group facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Tajikistan (see K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017; Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, 3 October 2013; and Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, 21 October 2010).
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 42874/18

  BURIYEV v. RUSSIA

  The general principles concerning the application of Article 3 have been summarised in F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, §§ 111-27, ECHR 2016, and in the context of removals from Russia to Tajikistan in Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 166-76, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, §§ 32-48, 7 November 2017.
• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 29958/20

  A.Y. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In so far as A.Y.'s and F.K.'s complaint concerns the risk of ill-treatment that they ran in Tajikistan, the present case is identical to cases in which the Court previously established that individuals whose extradition was sought by Tajik authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted a vulnerable group facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Tajikistan (see K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017; Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, 3 October 2013; and Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, 21 October 2010).
• EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 7445/21

  S.A. v. UKRAINE

  The Court considers that in view of the human rights situation in Tajikistan (see, for example, K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017; R.R. and A.R. v. Russia [Committee], nos. 67485/17 and 24014/18, 8 October 2019), and the applicant's submissions to the domestic authorities (see paragraph 4 above ), he had an "arguable claim" that he might face a risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in Tajikistan.