Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  Z.K. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 72710/11

  YARASHONEN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  Referring to (i) the Court's case-law, and in particular the judgment given in Yarashonen v. Turkey (no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014) (ii) the standards of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment concerning the conditions of detention of foreign nationals, and (iii) the report of the Human Rights Institution of Turkey of 2014 on the conditions at the Kumkapi Centre, the court considered that the conditions at the Kumkapi Centre constituted treatment incompatible with human dignity.

  10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, §§ 220, 222 and 223, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and the requirements of an effective remedy in the area of complaints about inhuman or degrading conditions of detention and the right to liberty and security within the context of immigration (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 93-98, 10 January 2012; Suso Musa v. Malta, no. 42337/12, §§ 50-51, 23 July 2013; and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, §§ 58-61, 24 June 2014).

• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12

  ADEN AHMED v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  As the Court has already stated above, the Constitutional Court was entrusted with specific jurisdiction to establish a breach of Convention provisions and the appropriate powers to secure redress for violations (see Uzun, cited above, §§ 63-64), and the Constitutional Court's decisions are binding on defaulting authorities and enforceable against them (see Aden Ahmed v. Malta, no. 55352/12, § 61, 23 July 2013, and Koçintar, cited above, § 43).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, §§ 220, 222 and 223, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and the requirements of an effective remedy in the area of complaints about inhuman or degrading conditions of detention and the right to liberty and security within the context of immigration (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 93-98, 10 January 2012; Suso Musa v. Malta, no. 42337/12, §§ 50-51, 23 July 2013; and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, §§ 58-61, 24 June 2014).

 
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 56511/16

  Türken vor dem EGMR: Keine direkte Klage erlaubt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  Subsequent to the adoption of its decision in the case of Uzun, the Court declared inadmissible a number of other cases raising various issues under the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies on account of the applicants" failure to apply to the Constitutional Court (see, for example, Özkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28745/11, ECHR 1 October 2013; Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77429/12, 1 July 2014; Schmick v. Turkey (dec.), no. 25963/14, 7 April 2015; X. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 61042/14, 19 May 2015; Duran v. Turkey (dec.), no. 79599/13, 19 May 2015; Berker and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 54769/13, 20 October 2015; Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511/16, 8 November 2016; and D.Ç.
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 10684/13

  D.C. c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10684/13, 7 February 2017).
• EGMR - 45886/07

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, §§ 220, 222 and 223, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and the requirements of an effective remedy in the area of complaints about inhuman or degrading conditions of detention and the right to liberty and security within the context of immigration (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 93-98, 10 January 2012; Suso Musa v. Malta, no. 42337/12, §§ 50-51, 23 July 2013; and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, §§ 58-61, 24 June 2014).
• EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 25963/14

  SCHMICK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  Subsequent to the adoption of its decision in the case of Uzun, the Court declared inadmissible a number of other cases raising various issues under the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies on account of the applicants" failure to apply to the Constitutional Court (see, for example, Özkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28745/11, ECHR 1 October 2013; Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77429/12, 1 July 2014; Schmick v. Turkey (dec.), no. 25963/14, 7 April 2015; X. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 61042/14, 19 May 2015; Duran v. Turkey (dec.), no. 79599/13, 19 May 2015; Berker and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 54769/13, 20 October 2015; Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511/16, 8 November 2016; and D.Ç.
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 61042/14

  X v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  Subsequent to the adoption of its decision in the case of Uzun, the Court declared inadmissible a number of other cases raising various issues under the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies on account of the applicants" failure to apply to the Constitutional Court (see, for example, Özkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28745/11, ECHR 1 October 2013; Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77429/12, 1 July 2014; Schmick v. Turkey (dec.), no. 25963/14, 7 April 2015; X. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 61042/14, 19 May 2015; Duran v. Turkey (dec.), no. 79599/13, 19 May 2015; Berker and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 54769/13, 20 October 2015; Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511/16, 8 November 2016; and D.Ç.
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 28745/11

  ÖZKAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  Subsequent to the adoption of its decision in the case of Uzun, the Court declared inadmissible a number of other cases raising various issues under the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies on account of the applicants" failure to apply to the Constitutional Court (see, for example, Özkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28745/11, ECHR 1 October 2013; Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77429/12, 1 July 2014; Schmick v. Turkey (dec.), no. 25963/14, 7 April 2015; X. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 61042/14, 19 May 2015; Duran v. Turkey (dec.), no. 79599/13, 19 May 2015; Berker and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 54769/13, 20 October 2015; Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511/16, 8 November 2016; and D.Ç.
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 79599/13

  DURAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 60831/15

  Subsequent to the adoption of its decision in the case of Uzun, the Court declared inadmissible a number of other cases raising various issues under the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies on account of the applicants" failure to apply to the Constitutional Court (see, for example, Özkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28745/11, ECHR 1 October 2013; Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77429/12, 1 July 2014; Schmick v. Turkey (dec.), no. 25963/14, 7 April 2015; X. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 61042/14, 19 May 2015; Duran v. Turkey (dec.), no. 79599/13, 19 May 2015; Berker and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 54769/13, 20 October 2015; Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511/16, 8 November 2016; and D.Ç.
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 54769/13

  BERKER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 77429/12

  KOÇINTAR c. TURQUIE