Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RYABININ AND SHATALINA v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  RYABININ AND SHATALINA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 34, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 33006/07

  Indeed, the burden of proof to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation may be regarded as lying with the authorities (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 33006/07

  Indeed, the burden of proof to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation may be regarded as lying with the authorities (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 33006/07

  The Court reiterates that allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV).

 
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 23563/07

  GAGLIANO GIORGI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 33006/07

  The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case (see Gagliano Giorgi v. Italy, no. 23563/07, § 55, ECHR 2012 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 35365/05

  LADYGIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 33006/07

  Inspired by the general principle de minimis non curat praetor, this first criterion of the rule rests on the premise that a violation of a right, however real from a purely legal point of view, should attain a minimum level of severity to warrant consideration by an international court (see Ladygin v. Russia (dec.), no. 35365/05, 30 August 2011).
• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05

  KOROLEV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 33006/07

  The question whether the applicant suffered any "significant disadvantage" represents the main element of the rule set forth in Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention (see Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 36659/04, 1 June 2010, and Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 36659/04

  IONESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 33006/07

  The question whether the applicant suffered any "significant disadvantage" represents the main element of the rule set forth in Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention (see Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 36659/04, 1 June 2010, and Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010).

• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 2446/15

  ALEKSEYEVY c. RUSSIE

  En outre, elle n'a pas précisé la valeur des objets saisis (voir, mutatis mutandis, Ryabinin et Shatalina c. Ukraine [comité], no 33006/07, §§ 170-171).