Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2000,40656
EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2000,40656)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.12.2000 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2000,40656)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Dezember 2000 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2000,40656)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,40656) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94

    ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    In order to comply with the rule, normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria no. 24760/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-VIII).
  • EGMR, 04.05.1999 - 34406/96

    MAZUREK contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

    Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

    DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    Furthermore, under Article 35 the existence of remedies which are available and sufficient must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, inter alia, the De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v, the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, § 39; the Vernillo v. France judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, § 27; and the Akdivar and Others v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1210 § 66).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91

    KROON AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    In this way, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see the Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48).
  • EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12849/87

    VERMEIRE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 35968/97

    Rechtssache V. K. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

    Er kann manchmal Aspekte der physischen und sozialen Identität einer Person umfassen ( Mikulic ./. Kroatien , Beschwerde-Nr. 53176/99, Nr. 53, 7. Februar 2002).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht