Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 64387/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,49124) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STOYANOV AND TABAKOV v. BULGARIA (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
STOYANOV AND TABAKOV v. BULGARIA
Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 64387/14
- EGMR, 02.05.2023 - 64387/14
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02
Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 64387/14
The Court reiterates that the Committee of Ministers" role in supervising the enforcement of the Court's judgments does not mean that measures taken by a respondent State to remedy a violation found by the Court cannot raise a new issue undecided by the judgment and, as such, form the subject of a new application that may be dealt with by the Court (see Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 62, ECHR 2009, with further references). - EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00
BURDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 64387/14
The Court reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 64387/14
39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII). - EGMR, 10.04.2008 - 21071/05
WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 64387/14
The Court does not have jurisdiction to verify whether a Contracting Party has complied with the obligations imposed on it by one of the Court's judgments (see Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2), no. 21071/05, § 31, 10 April 2008, with further reference).