Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25803/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,56873) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINICIC v. CROATIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98
JASIUNIENE v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25803/05
The Court recalls its case-law that the impossibility for an applicant to obtain the execution of a judgment in his or her favour constitutes an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions, as set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III; JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 45, 6 March 2003). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25803/05
Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Schenk v. Austria, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140, and Garcia Ruiz v. Spain, no. 30544/96, § 28, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-I).