Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,40500
EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00 (https://dejure.org/2001,40500)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.03.2001 - 54727/00 (https://dejure.org/2001,40500)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. März 2001 - 54727/00 (https://dejure.org/2001,40500)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,40500) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 19.02.1998 - 26102/95

    DALIA v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, inter alia, the Vernillo v. France judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, § 27, and Dalia v. France, no. 26102/95, § 38, ECHR 1998-I).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

    FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    Thus, although the person concerned can lodge a complaint directly with the Constitutional Court, the formal institution of proceedings depends on the latter's discretion (see, mutatis mutandis, Feldek v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 29032/95, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

    VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    It has further recognised that the rule of exhaustion is neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; in reviewing whether it has been observed it is essential to have regard to the particular circumstances of each individual case (see the Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 18, § 35).
  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    In this way, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see e.g. the Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48).
  • EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

    CARDOT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    Accordingly, it has recognised that the rule of domestic remedies must be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see the Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34).
  • EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

    KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    The need to avoid excessive rigidity and to keep pace with changing circumstances means that many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, the Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 20, § 29 and Kokkinakis v. Greece judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 19, § 40).
  • EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

    DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    It is not for the Court to give a ruling on an issue of Croatian law that is as yet unsettled (see, mutatis mutandis, the De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, § 39).
  • EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84

    MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2001 - 54727/00
    The need to avoid excessive rigidity and to keep pace with changing circumstances means that many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, the Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 20, § 29 and Kokkinakis v. Greece judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 19, § 40).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht