Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.06.1999 - 39511/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,27081) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McGUINNESS contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 14 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McGUINNESS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 14 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.1999 - 39511/98
However, Article 13 cannot reasonably be interpreted so as to require a remedy in domestic law in respect of any supposed grievance under the Convention that an individual may have, no matter how unmeritorious his complaint may be: the grievance must be an arguable one in terms of the Convention (see the Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52). - EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 17851/91
Radikalenerlaß
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.1999 - 39511/98
For the Court, the requirement that elected representatives to the House of Commons take an oath of allegiance to the reigning monarch can be reasonably viewed as an affirmation of loyalty to the constitutional principles which support, inter alia, the workings of representative democracy in the respondent State (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vogt v. Germany judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 323, p. 28, § 59). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.1999 - 39511/98
They represent their electorate, draw attention to their constituents' preoccupations and defend their interests (see, mutatis mutandis, the Castells v. Spain judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, pp. 22-23, § 42). - EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81
MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.1999 - 39511/98
In particular, such conditions must not thwart "the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of legislature" (see, mutatis mutandis, the Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, p. 23, § 52).
- EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06
SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE
[43] McGuinness v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39511/98, ECHR 1999-V.