Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.06.2017 - 1068/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,18158) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SCHWAB v. AUSTRIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 08.06.2017 - 1068/12
- EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 1068/12
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90
FISCHER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2017 - 1068/12
The Court reiterates that the applicant was in principle entitled to have a public hearing (see, for example, Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, § 33, Series A no. 325-A, and Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071/96, § 55, 12 July 2001) and notes that only the Administrative Court could qualify as "tribunal" (see, mutatis mutandis, Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 44, Series A no. 312; Pauger v. Austria, 28 May 1997, § 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III; and Bakker v. Austria, no. 43454/98, § 29, 10 April 2003). - EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91
DIENNET v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2017 - 1068/12
The Court reiterates that the applicant was in principle entitled to have a public hearing (see, for example, Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, § 33, Series A no. 325-A, and Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071/96, § 55, 12 July 2001) and notes that only the Administrative Court could qualify as "tribunal" (see, mutatis mutandis, Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 44, Series A no. 312; Pauger v. Austria, 28 May 1997, § 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III; and Bakker v. Austria, no. 43454/98, § 29, 10 April 2003). - EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2017 - 1068/12
The Court considers that in the course of proceedings in which exclusively legal or highly technical questions are at stake, the requirements of Article 6 may be fulfilled even in the absence of an oral hearing (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263; Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no. 64336/01, 25 April 2002; and Schelling v. Austria, no. 55193/00, § 30, 10 November 2005).