Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VO v. FRANCE
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2 MRK
Preliminary objections rejected (ratione materiae non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) No violation of Art. 2 (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VO c. FRANCE
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2 MRK
Exceptions préliminaires rejetées (ratione materiae non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Non-violation de l'art. 2 (französisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse (3)
- Wolters Kluwer (Leitsatz)
Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens; Anwendbarkeit des Art. 2 Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten (EMRK) auf den Embryo oder Fötus; Ungewollter Abbruch einer Schwangerschaft; Fehlen strafrechtlicher Vorschriften wegen der fahrlässigen Tötung eines ...
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
- rechtsportal.de(Abodienst, kostenloses Probeabo) (Leitsatz)
EMRK Art. 2
Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach ärztlichem Behandlungsfehler
Besprechungen u.ä.
- Universität des Saarlandes (Entscheidungsbesprechung)
Neuere Entwicklungen in der Schutzpflichtdogmatik des EGMR am Beispiel des Falles Vo/Frankreich (Kerstin Blau; ZEuS 2005, 397)
Papierfundstellen
- NJW 2005, 727
Wird zitiert von ... (255)
- EGMR, 12.11.2008 - 34503/97
Demir und Baykara ./. Türkei - Streikrecht für Beamte
The Court further observes that it has always referred to the "living" nature of the Convention, which must be interpreted in the light of present-day conditions, and that it has taken account of evolving norms of national and international law in its interpretation of Convention provisions (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 102, Series A no. 161; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 82, ECHR 2004-VIII; and Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 121, ECHR 2005-I). - EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 9300/07
Herrmann ./. Deutschland
Frankreich [GK], Nr. 53924/00, Rdnrn. 82 und 84, CEDH 2004-VIII. - EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 31322/07
HAAS c. SUISSE
La Cour rappelle par ailleurs que la Convention et ses Protocoles doivent s'interpréter à la lumière des conditions d'aujourd'hui (Tyrer c. Royaume-Uni, 25 avril 1978, § 31, série A no 26, Airey c. Irlande, 9 octobre 1979, § 26, série A no 32, et Vo c. France [GC], no 53924/00, § 82, CEDH 2004-VIII).
- EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 48939/99
ÖNERYILDIZ c. TURQUIE
In this connection, the Court has held that if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case and may be satisfied if civil, administrative or even disciplinary remedies were available to the victims (see, for example, Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Calvelli and Ciglio, cited above, § 51; and Mastromatteo, cited above, §§ 90 and 94-95).In Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy ([GC], no. 32967/96, ECHR 2002-I), Mastromatteo v. Italy ([GC], no. 37703/97, ECHR 2002-VIII), and Vo v. France ([GC], no. 53924/00, ECHR 2004-VIII), the Court expressed the view that "if the infringement of the right to life or to personal integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation imposed by Article 2 to set up an effective judicial system does not necessarily require the provision of a criminal-law remedy in every case".
- EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02
BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
In this connection, the Court has held that if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case and may be satisfied if civil, administrative or even disciplinary remedies were available to the victims (see, for example, Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I; and Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 90 and 94-95, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 10.04.2007 - 6339/05
EVANS c. ROYAUME-UNI
In its judgment of 7 March 2006, the Chamber observed that in Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 82, ECHR 2004-VIII, the Grand Chamber had held that, in the absence of any European consensus on the scientific and legal definition of the beginning of life, the issue of when the right to life begins comes within the margin of appreciation which the Court generally considers that States should enjoy in this sphere. - EGMR, 27.08.2015 - 46470/11
PARRILLO v. ITALY
Referring to Vo v. France ([GC], no. 53924/00, § 82, ECHR 2004-VIII), it pointed out, lastly, that the Court allowed States to determine in their domestic legal order "when the right to life begins" and that it afforded them a wide margin of appreciation in this area (A, B and C v. Ireland, cited above, § 237).In this context, it is crucially important to note that the Grand Chamber did not cite paragraph 56 from Evans v. the United Kingdom (cited above) in which the Court had stated that "the embryos created by the applicant and J. [did] not have a right to life within the meaning of Article 2 of the Convention", nor the Chamber judgment of 7 March 2006 in that case, § 46, nor even the classic statement of principle in Vo v. France ([GC], no. 53924/00, § 82, ECHR 2004).
See, for example, Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 75 and 80, ECHR 2004-VIII; Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, ECHR 2007-I; Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, ECHR 2007-V; Brüggemann and Scheuten v. Germany, no. 6959/75, Commission Report of 12 July 1977, Decisions and Reports (DR) 10, p. 100; H. v. Norway, no. 17004/90, Commission decision of 19 May 1992, DR 73, p. 155.
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Tel est le cas par exemple, dans le domaine de la santé, en ce qui concerne les actes ou omissions des professionnels de la santé (Dodov, précité, §§ 70, 79-83 et 87, et Vo c. France [GC], no 53924/00, §§ 89-90, CEDH 2004-VIII, avec d'autres références), les États devant mettre en place un cadre réglementaire imposant aux hôpitaux, qu'ils soient publics ou privés, l'adoption de mesures propres à assurer la protection de la vie de leurs malades (Calvelli et Ciglio c. Italie [GC], no 32967/96, § 49, CEDH 2002-I). - EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 25579/05
A, B und C ./. Irland
Il est aussi arrivé à la Cour de prendre en compte l'existence ou l'absence d'un consensus pour définir l'étendue de la marge d'appréciation à accorder aux Etats dans l'exercice de mise en balance d'intérêts concurrents ou pour déterminer si une décision particulière rentrait ou non dans la marge d'appréciation de l'Etat (Evans c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 6339/05, § 77, CEDH 2007-IV ; Fretté c. France, no 36515/97, § 41, CEDH 2002-I ; Vo c. France [GC], no 53924/00, § 82, CEDH 2004-VIII). - EGMR, 10.12.2007 - 69698/01
STOLL c. SUISSE
(As regards the principle, well established in the Court's case-law, whereby the Convention must be interpreted in the light of present-day conditions, see, for example, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 31, Series A no. 26; Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 26, Series A no. 32; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 82, ECHR 2004-VIII; and Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 121, ECHR 2005-I.). - EGMR, 22.05.2014 - 49278/09
"Herr Doktor from Germany" ist in Großbritannien nicht mehr so gerne gesehen
- EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 39051/03
EMONET ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 5786/08
Gesetzeslücke: Menschenrechtsgerichtshof verurteilt Schweden wegen Nacktaufnahmen
- EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 56080/13
LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03
TYSIAC c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 30.04.2009 - 13444/04
GLOR v. SWITZERLAND
- EGMR, 13.07.2012 - 16354/06
MOUVEMENT RAËLIEN SUISSE c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 5418/15
Bootsunglück vor Farmakonisi: Griechenland muss Flüchtlinge entschädigen
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 47039/11
HRISTOZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
M.L. v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 61243/08
ELBERTE v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 1398/03
MARKOVIC ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 13423/09
MEHMET SENTÜRK ET BEKIR SENTÜRK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 3648/04
CAVIT TINARLIOGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 22296/20
BARET ET CABALLERO c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 29002/06
SCHLUMPF c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 18968/07
V.C. v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 25762/07
SCHWIZGEBEL v. SWITZERLAND
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23405/16
S.F. c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4605/05
PETROVA v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 48609/06
NENCHEVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 77144/01
Rechtssache C. und T. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 36777/03
IRIBARREN PINILLOS c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18
KRACHUNOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 19776/04
CIECHONSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 11502/22
AKSOGAN c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 42434/15
MARDOSAI v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 40448/06
AYDOGDU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 45076/05
ARSKAYA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 75173/01
SEVIM GÜNGÖR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 39855/02
PAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43134/05
G.N. u.a. ./. Italien
- EGMR, 05.03.2024 - 44530/18
MOMCILOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 40209/20
KOILOVA ET BABULKOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 16318/07
MORETTI ET BENEDETTI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 46598/06
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2006 - 6339/05
EVANS c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 46156/11
KARAKOCA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 76973/01
MURILLO SALDIAS ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 42749/19
ERDAL MUHAMMET ARSLAN ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 24109/07
ASIYE GENÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 44084/10
GÜLAY ÇETIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 49278/09
GRAY v. GERMANY AND UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 23944/04
EREMIASOVA AND PECHOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 28634/06
MAIORANO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 40160/12
ZUBAC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 34661/07
MUCIBABIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 58255/08
AKDEMIR ET EVIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 16354/06
Mouvement Raelien Suisse ./. Schweiz
- EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 10653/10
HUSEYNOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 4864/05
OYAL v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99
TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17
BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 50772/11
ERDINÇ KURT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 30.06.2011 - 22590/04
GIRARD c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 25266/05
YARDIMCI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 58447/00
ZAVOLOKA c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 59548/00
DODOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 6084/06
ATSIZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 30812/07
TRÉVALEC c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 7259/03
MITKUS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 21387/05
BANKS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 62007/17
L.F. v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 76805/11
KRAULAIDIS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 32086/07
ALTUG ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 12317/06
AKOPYAN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 11273/05
CSIKI c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 25732/05
KRIVOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 42994/05
FURDIK v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 71463/01
SILIH v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 39583/05
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 9718/03
GEORGEL AND GEORGETA STOICESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 32146/05
EUGENIA LAZAR c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 64301/01
VELCEA ET MAZARE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 52955/99
HUYLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.02.2023 - 59435/17
ALHOWAIS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 72781/12
YIRDEM ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 58240/08
SARISHVILI-BOLKVADZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 20184/06
SÜRER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 34215/11
KOLACZYK AND KWIATKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 45721/09
SÜLEYMAN EGE c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
BANEL v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 70035/10
NEDESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 25774/09
ZAFER ÖZTÜRK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 14092/06
CIORAP c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA (N° 4)
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 3757/09
ALP c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 43036/08
GÜVENÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 13904/07
KUDRA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 10904/05
PRYNDA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 19986/06
ILBEYI KEMALOGLU AND MERIYE KEMALOGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 15492/09
SAKHVADZE v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 35254/07
MAKHARADZE AND SIKHARULIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 7823/06
STIHI-BOOS c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 18751/05
HAYRI ASLAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4762/05
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 69869/01
BONE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 21.10.2004 - 76774/01
POCKAJEVS c. LETTONIE
- EGMR - 19202/03
[FRE]
- EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 49092/12
ÖNEY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 61772/12
TÜLAY YILDIZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 18356/11
Statt Zwillingen nur ein Kind: Türkin wird nach Fehldiagnose entschädigt
- EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 37930/09
TAMUÇU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 81270/12
IONITA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 81277/12
SAYAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 74114/12
ELENA COJOCARU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08
ZUBKOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 8759/05
CSOMA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 19202/03
ILIYA PETROV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 9296/06
SHUMKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2012 - 22737/04
IGOR SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 36369/06
YAZGÜL YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 4532/04
ROMOKHOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 63101/00
FLOAREA POP c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 39953/07
BAILEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 42117/04
BRUNET-LECOMTE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 22750/02
BENDERSKIY c. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 5410/03
TYSIAC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 62915/00
BACCHINI c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 4904/20
AL c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 5049/14
PITSILADI ET VASILELLIS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 12105/13
STEPANYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 59227/12
LOSTE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 20.10.2022 - 23037/16
KORNICKA-ZIOBRO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 38572/17
POPOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 11967/12
MECIT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 66859/12
ARPALI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.02.2019 - 57273/16
CHAABAN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 43185/11
ELVAN ALKAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 1858/13
KIZIL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 14185/14
V.P. v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 51279/12
MENKU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 3853/14
A.V. v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 62870/13
BILBIJA AND BLAZEVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 39008/08
AYDEMIR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 45847/05
MARAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56556/10
ISTRATOIU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 49794/10
MOTOCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 46863/09
BARANSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 13959/06
BIÇER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.11.2013 - 40525/05
NIKOLAY VOLKOGONOV AND IGOR VOLKOGONOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 41107/07
KOCESKI v.
- EGMR, 07.05.2013 - 29158/05
GABRIELA HORTENZIA RADULESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 6194/06
ZAHARIEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 34885/06
DEMIR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 1668/03
IONEL ET MARIA ELENA TATAR c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 39442/07
CUCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 8163/07
ALHAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 23039/02
WEBER ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 01.09.2009 - 13754/02
MOLIE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 48906/06
VARNIMA CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL S.A. c. GRECE
- EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 32478/02
SERGEY SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 28079/04
GREEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 14445/13
TURGUT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 48855/20
TEKEMEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 25364/15
ARESTEIDOU AND ARESTI v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
TOTCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
- EGMR, 01.12.2020 - 21024/08
PANOVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 35861/11
KEKELASHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 37829/17
ISIK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.05.2019 - 62876/15
MILIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 36680/11
BIÇAKLI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13
DUMPE v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 18.09.2018 - 68245/11
DOGANSAHIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 60245/08
YAKICI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.03.2018 - 44154/14
R.S. v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 52797/08
MEHMET GÜNAY ET GÜLLÜ GÜNAY v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 40425/11
AKTAS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 28678/10
BINNUR UZUN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 49045/13
RÕIGAS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 20.06.2017 - 2272/11
TEKER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 960/13
KOSTECKAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 09.05.2017 - 68516/14
FERGEC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15
BRONSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 12647/11
UYAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 11726/09
NICOLSCHI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 33273/11
GÜNES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 43885/13
MIRCEA POP c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 3584/10
ARI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 38804/09
DELICE c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 15022/08
HACIÖMEROGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.05.2015 - 75468/10
OLSOY v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 23195/11
KUTSEVYCH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 55569/08
V.V.G. v.
- EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 6788/12
RITCHIE AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 26.08.2014 - 26874/08
LAZAROVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 30.04.2014 - 13596/05
TIKHONOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 22490/05
MARINA ALEKSEYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 4050/10
M. v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35887/11
DE SANTIS ET OLANDA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 59707/09
BAYTEKIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07
ÇOSELAV v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 18698/06
VAKRILOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 44252/10
BANICEVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 31214/09
ÖZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 4348/02
TROFIN c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 10891/06
MEDARD c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 23302/03
ANNA TODOROVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 31223/09
ZERE c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 42980/04
STOYANOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 33512/04
KOROGODINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 50533/07
CASSEZ DESJARDINS ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 32540/05
VRBICA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 45325/06
LOPEZ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 21868/02
ALICAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 1062/07
STAGNO c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 24562/03
CLINIQUE SAINTE MARIE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 11562/05
BYRZYKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.05.2005 - 58670/00
URSU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03
ROWLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 64013/00
LEFEBVRE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 14742/18
RAZNATOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 15613/10
VOVK AND BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 44052/11
ISILDAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 35523/06
ISAYEVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 73025/13
BOTYANOVSKAYA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 18986/06
KARAKUTSYA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 22323/08
LOVYGINY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.01.2016 - 8347/12
SHEPELENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 66309/09
GÖKDEMIR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 50504/09
CICHON v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 7291/09
OANCEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07
E.M. AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 39974/10
M.P. AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 72254/11
BOGDANOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 6318/03
VALERIY FUKLEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 33475/09
ALTUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 14730/09
KARPISIEWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 39899/11
AYDIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 25124/09
TRZEPALKO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 47304/07
BERÜ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 39141/04
VALLY ET AUTRE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 73296/01
KAYA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 78/02
ADELAIDE ET AUTRE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 471/13
TOPÇUOGLU c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 04.11.2021 - 63126/13
TRETYAKOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 28.07.2016 - 65663/12
MARCHUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 28511/11
KOSTOVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 5722/04
KARCHEN ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 1396/06
McBRIDE c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 35640/08
ARCHEBASOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 3148/14
IWANOWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 8065/04
PAGES c. FRANCE