Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 10273/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARCHOWSKI v. POLAND
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 10273/02
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 10273/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 10273/02
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of detention on remand (aresztowanie tymczasowe), the grounds for its extension, release from detention and rules governing other "preventive measures" (srodki zapobiegawcze) are stated in the Court's judgments in the cases of Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 75-79, ECHR 2000-XI; Baginski v. Poland, no. 37444/97, §§ 42-46, 11 October 2005; and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006.The Court reiterates that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, were stated in a number of its previous judgements (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI, and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04
CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 10273/02
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of detention on remand (aresztowanie tymczasowe), the grounds for its extension, release from detention and rules governing other "preventive measures" (srodki zapobiegawcze) are stated in the Court's judgments in the cases of Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 75-79, ECHR 2000-XI; Baginski v. Poland, no. 37444/97, §§ 42-46, 11 October 2005; and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006.The Court reiterates that the principles relevant in the present case which emerge from the Court's case-law on Article 5 § 4 have been stated in a number of its previous judgments (see for instance, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998; Telecki v. Poland, (dec.), no. 56552/00, 3 July 2003; Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, § 47, 4 May 2006; and Depa v. Poland, no. 62324/00, § 49, 12 December 2006).
- EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 10273/02
It marks out the temporal limits of supervision carried out by the organs of the Convention and signals both to individuals and to State authorities the period beyond which such supervision is no longer possible (see Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I).