Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 12455/04, 14140/05, 12906/06, 26028/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.07.2008 - 12455/04, 14140/05, 12906/06, 26028/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,67060)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Juli 2008 - 12455/04, 14140/05, 12906/06, 26028/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,67060)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,67060) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOKIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objections dismissed (victim non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 5-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 12455/04, 14140/05, 12906/06, 26028/06
- EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 12455/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 12455/04
In principle, the "detention" of a person as a mental health patient will only be "lawful" for the purposes of sub-paragraph (e) of paragraph 1 if effected in a hospital, clinic or other appropriate institution (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 21, § 44; Aerts, cited above, loc. cit.; and Bizzotto, cited above, loc. cit.). - EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96
VARBANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 12455/04
For the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (e), an individual cannot be deprived of his liberty as being of "unsound mind" unless the following three minimum conditions are satisfied: firstly, he must reliably be shown to be of unsound mind; secondly, the mental disorder must be of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement; thirdly, the validity of continued confinement depends upon the persistence of such a disorder (see Winterwerp, cited above, pp. 17-18, § 39; Johnson v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 October 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2409, § 60; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 45, ECHR 2000-X; and David v. Moldova, no. 41578/05, § 39, 27 November 2007). - EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 41578/05
DAVID v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 12455/04
For the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (e), an individual cannot be deprived of his liberty as being of "unsound mind" unless the following three minimum conditions are satisfied: firstly, he must reliably be shown to be of unsound mind; secondly, the mental disorder must be of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement; thirdly, the validity of continued confinement depends upon the persistence of such a disorder (see Winterwerp, cited above, pp. 17-18, § 39; Johnson v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 October 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2409, § 60; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 45, ECHR 2000-X; and David v. Moldova, no. 41578/05, § 39, 27 November 2007). - EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 12455/04
While the Government accepted that the applicants" detention was not in accordance with the relevant domestic law as from the 2003 reform of the criminal legislation and that Zenica Prison Forensic Psychiatric Annex was not an appropriate institution for people detained under Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention, they maintained that the applicants could not have been immediately and unconditionally discharged because of the persistence of a mental disorder warranting compulsory confinement (they referred to Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 17-18, § 39).