Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  D. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 13+8, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partiellement radiée du rôle Partiellement irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  D. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM [Extracts]

  Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  D. ET R. c. BELGIQUE

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [FRA]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 27853/09

  X v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29176/13

  It is therefore incumbent on the Court to determine whether that interference was "in accordance with the law", pursued one or more of the legitimate aims set out in Article 8 § 2 of the Convention, and was "necessary in a democratic society" to achieve them (see X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, § 54, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 29.06.1999 - 27110/95

  NYLUND contre la FINLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29176/13

  To this effect, it has previously held that Article 8 can also extend to the potential relationship which may develop, for example, between a natural father and a child born out of wedlock (see Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no. 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI ), or to the relationship that arises from a lawful and genuine marriage, even if a family life has not yet been fully established (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no. 94).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29176/13

  To this effect, it has previously held that Article 8 can also extend to the potential relationship which may develop, for example, between a natural father and a child born out of wedlock (see Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no. 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI ), or to the relationship that arises from a lawful and genuine marriage, even if a family life has not yet been fully established (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no. 94).

 
• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 78028/01

  PINI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29176/13

  However, the Court reiterates that an intended family life does not fall entirely outside the ambit of Article 8 (see Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 143, ECHR 2004-V [extracts]).
• EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 76240/01

  WAGNER ET J.M.W.L. c. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29176/13

  The Court reiterates that it has acknowledged the applicability of Article 8 where de facto family ties exist (see X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, §§ 36-37, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II, and Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 117, 28 June 2007).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84

  BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29176/13

  The applicants pointed out that the right to maintain family relations between parents and their children had to take precedence over the interests of the State (see Berrehab v. the Netherlands, 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138), and that in any case the best interests of the child should be the primary consideration (see Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 33932/06

  TODOROVA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29176/13

  It is not disputed in the instant case that the applicants" genuinely wished to look after A. as his parents ever since his birth and that they took action to guarantee an effective family life (see, mutatis mutandis, Todorova v. Italy, no. 33932/06, § 54, 13 January 2009).

• EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 47022/16

  O.L.G. c. FRANCE

  La Cour renvoie par ailleurs à sa décision dans l'affaire D. c. Belgique (no 29176/13, 8 juillet 2017), qui concernait le refus d'autoriser l'entrée en Belgique d'un enfant né en Ukraine à l'issue d'une gestation pour autrui ; les parents d'intention, qui se plaignaient en particulier d'une violation de l'article 8 de la Convention, avaient utilisé une procédure comparable au référé-liberté de l'article L. 521-2 du code de justice administrative afin d'obtenir du juge des référés qu'il ordonne aux autorités belges de délivrer un titre de voyage permettant à l'enfant d'entrer en Belgique.