Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 52584/09

  The Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014, and Ksenz and Others v. Russia, nos. 45044/06 and 5 others, § 86, 12 December 2017).
• EGMR, 25.06.2015 - 36229/11

  ISAYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 52584/09

  However, for reasons of convenience, the text of this judgment will continue to refer to Mr Ali Hasanov as "the applicant", even though only Ms Narmina Hasanova is now to be regarded as having the status of applicant before the Court (see Isayeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 36229/11, § 62, 25 June 2015, and Tagiyev and Huseynov, cited above, § 24).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 52584/09

  The Court notes that in various cases in which an applicant has died in the course of the Convention proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among other authorities, Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX; Pisarkiewicz v. Poland, no. 18967/02, §§ 30-33, 22 January 2008; and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, §§ 27-30, 8 April 2014).

 
• EGMR, 05.12.2019 - 13274/08

  TAGIYEV AND HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 52584/09

  In view of the above and having regard to the circumstances of the present case, the Court accepts that Ms Narmina Hasanova has a legitimate interest in pursuing the application in her late husband's stead (see Tagiyev and Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 13274/08, § 24, 5 December 2019 ).
• EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 73359/10

  ERGEZEN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 52584/09

  The Court notes that in various cases in which an applicant has died in the course of the Convention proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among other authorities, Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX; Pisarkiewicz v. Poland, no. 18967/02, §§ 30-33, 22 January 2008; and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, §§ 27-30, 8 April 2014).
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06

  KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 52584/09

  The Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014, and Ksenz and Others v. Russia, nos. 45044/06 and 5 others, § 86, 12 December 2017).

• EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 28728/22

  IBISHBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  Noting the admissions contained in the Government's declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed - which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases (see, for example, Mahmudov and Agazade v. Azerbaijan, no. 35877/04, §§ 61 and 64, 18 December 2008; Hasanov v. Azerbaijan [Committee], no. 52584/09, §§ 38 and 41, 8 July 2021; Mahmudov and Agazade v. Azerbaijan [Committee], no. 28083/08, §§ 38 and 41, 22 July 2021; and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos.