Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44841/08
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 44841/08

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 39692/09

  AUSTIN ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 44841/08

  39692/09 and 2 others, § 61, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 44841/08

  According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 22491/08

  SEFILYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 44841/08

  The Court refers to its general principles under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention relating to the right to be released pending trial (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, §§ 92-102, ECHR 2016 (extracts), and Ara Harutyunyan, cited above, §§ 48-53) and notes that it has already found the use of stereotyped formulae when imposing and extending detention to be a recurring problem in Armenia (see, among other authorities, Piruzyan v. Armenia, no. 33376/07, §§ 97-100, 26 June 2012; Malkhasyan v. Armenia, no. 6729/07, §§ 74-77, 26 June 2012; Sefilyan v. Armenia, no. 22491/08, §§ 88-93, 2 October 2012; and Ara Harutyunyan, cited above, §§ 54-59).

• EGMR, 08.06.2023 - 46530/09

  URGESI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Quant au partage de la fonction de procureur avec d'autres membres du parquet, le fait que U.M. a joué un rôle dans les poursuites menées contre les requérants suffit pour conclure qu'il s'était exprimé auparavant sur leur responsabilité pénale (voir Jhangiryan c. Arménie, nos 44841/08 et 63701/09, § 101, 8 octobre 2020).
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 54547/16

  SHIRKHANYAN v. ARMENIA

  44841/08 and 63701/09, § 76, 8 October 2020; and Smbat Ayvazyan v. Armenia, no. 49021/08, § 78, 8 October 2020).
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 22665/10

  PASHINYAN v. ARMENIA

  As a general rule, where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and it is for the latter to establish the facts on the basis of the evidence before them, although there may be circumstances in which the Court will depart from the findings of fact reached by the domestic courts, including in cases concerning Article 10 and 11 rights (see, for example, Jhangiryan v. Armenia, nos. 44841/08 and 63701/09, §§ 114 and 123, 8 October 2020, and Smbat Ayvazyan v. Armenia, no. 49021/08, §§ 119 and 129, 8 October 2020, both of which concerned the same protest movement as in the present case).