Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,41252
EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,41252)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.11.2005 - 6847/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,41252)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. November 2005 - 6847/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,41252)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,41252) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE [Extraits]

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violations de l'art. 3 Non-violation de l'art. 5-1 (deux périodes de détention) Violation de l'art. 5-1 (deux périodes de détention) Violation de l'art. 5-3 Violation de l'art. 5-4 Violation de l'art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KHUDOYOROV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violations of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 5-1 (two periods of detention) Violation of Art. 5-1 (two periods of detention) Violation of Art. 5-3 Violations of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (311)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99

    SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    The arguments for and against release must not be "general and abstract" (see Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 63, ECHR 2003-IX).
  • EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

    LETELLIER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    It must be assessed with reference to a number of other relevant factors which may either confirm the existence of a danger of absconding or make it appear so slight that it cannot justify detention pending trial (see Panchenko, cited above, § 106; Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 43).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95

    BARANOWSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    It is therefore essential that the conditions for deprivation of liberty under domestic law be clearly defined and that the law itself be foreseeable in its application, so that it meets the standard of "lawfulness" set by the Convention, a standard which requires that all law be sufficiently precise to allow the person - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

    JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    It is therefore essential that the conditions for deprivation of liberty under domestic law be clearly defined and that the law itself be foreseeable in its application, so that it meets the standard of "lawfulness" set by the Convention, a standard which requires that all law be sufficiently precise to allow the person - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    Under this provision the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (Valasinas, cited above, § 102; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

    PEERS v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    In this connection the Court notes that in the Peers case even a much bigger cell (7 sq. m for two inmates) was considered a relevant factor in finding a violation of Article 3, albeit in that case the problem of space was coupled with an established lack of ventilation and lighting (Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 70-72, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

    VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, §§ 100-101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 30138/02

    NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
    By contrast, in other cases no violation of Article 3 was found, as the restricted space for sleeping was compensated for by the freedom of movement enjoyed by the detainees during the day-time (Valasinas, cited above, §§ 103 and 107; Nurmagomedov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30138/02, 16 September 2004).
  • EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

    BOZANO v. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

    Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen,

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).

    Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts) (OD-1/T-2, Vladimir, 2000-2004).

  • BFH, 07.11.2013 - X K 13/12

    Unangemessene Dauer eines finanzgerichtlichen Klageverfahrens

    Ganz überwiegend sind diese Entscheidungen von vornherein nicht zu Art. 6 Abs. 1 EMRK ergangen, der den Anspruch auf Entscheidung "innerhalb angemessener Frist" enthält, sondern zu Freiheitsentziehungen i.S. des Art. 5 EMRK, der in Abs. 4 einen Anspruch auf gerichtliche Entscheidung "innerhalb kurzer Frist" vorsieht (zu Strafverfahren in der Russischen Förderation vgl. Entscheidungen des EGMR vom 7. April 2005  54071/00 --Rokhlina--; vom 8. November 2005  6847/02 --Khudoyorov--; vom 24. Mai 2007  27193/02 --Ignatov--, Rz 111; vom 9. Oktober 2008  62936/00 --Moiseyev--, Rz 160, und vom 26. November 2009  13591/05 --Nazarov--, Rz 126; zur zwangsweisen Unterbringung eines als "Psychopathen" eingestuften Straftäters in einer britischen Klinik vgl. EGMR-Urteil vom 20. Februar 2003  50272/99 --Hutchison Reid--, Rz 79).
  • EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

    VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht