Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE [Extraits]
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violations de l'art. 3 Non-violation de l'art. 5-1 (deux périodes de détention) Violation de l'art. 5-1 (deux périodes de détention) Violation de l'art. 5-3 Violation de l'art. 5-4 Violation de l'art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHUDOYOROV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violations of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 5-1 (two periods of detention) Violation of Art. 5-1 (two periods of detention) Violation of Art. 5-3 Violations of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 6847/02
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
Wird zitiert von ... (311) Neu Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
The arguments for and against release must not be "general and abstract" (see Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 63, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
It must be assessed with reference to a number of other relevant factors which may either confirm the existence of a danger of absconding or make it appear so slight that it cannot justify detention pending trial (see Panchenko, cited above, § 106; Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 43). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95
BARANOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
It is therefore essential that the conditions for deprivation of liberty under domestic law be clearly defined and that the law itself be foreseeable in its application, so that it meets the standard of "lawfulness" set by the Convention, a standard which requires that all law be sufficiently precise to allow the person - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III).
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
It is therefore essential that the conditions for deprivation of liberty under domestic law be clearly defined and that the law itself be foreseeable in its application, so that it meets the standard of "lawfulness" set by the Convention, a standard which requires that all law be sufficiently precise to allow the person - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
Under this provision the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (Valasinas, cited above, § 102; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
In this connection the Court notes that in the Peers case even a much bigger cell (7 sq. m for two inmates) was considered a relevant factor in finding a violation of Article 3, albeit in that case the problem of space was coupled with an established lack of ventilation and lighting (Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 70-72, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, §§ 100-101, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 30138/02
NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
By contrast, in other cases no violation of Article 3 was found, as the restricted space for sleeping was compensated for by the freedom of movement enjoyed by the detainees during the day-time (Valasinas, cited above, §§ 103 and 107; Nurmagomedov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30138/02, 16 September 2004). - EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82
BOZANO v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98
Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts) (OD-1/T-2, Vladimir, 2000-2004).
- BFH, 07.11.2013 - X K 13/12
Unangemessene Dauer eines finanzgerichtlichen Klageverfahrens
Ganz überwiegend sind diese Entscheidungen von vornherein nicht zu Art. 6 Abs. 1 EMRK ergangen, der den Anspruch auf Entscheidung "innerhalb angemessener Frist" enthält, sondern zu Freiheitsentziehungen i.S. des Art. 5 EMRK, der in Abs. 4 einen Anspruch auf gerichtliche Entscheidung "innerhalb kurzer Frist" vorsieht (zu Strafverfahren in der Russischen Förderation vgl. Entscheidungen des EGMR vom 7. April 2005 54071/00 --Rokhlina--; vom 8. November 2005 6847/02 --Khudoyorov--; vom 24. Mai 2007 27193/02 --Ignatov--, Rz 111; vom 9. Oktober 2008 62936/00 --Moiseyev--, Rz 160, und vom 26. November 2009 13591/05 --Nazarov--, Rz 126; zur zwangsweisen Unterbringung eines als "Psychopathen" eingestuften Straftäters in einer britischen Klinik vgl. EGMR-Urteil vom 20. Februar 2003 50272/99 --Hutchison Reid--, Rz 79). - EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12
VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
- EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 16483/12
Lampedusa-Haft war illegal
Thus, in such cases, the Court has found a violation of Article 3 where the lack of space went together with other poor material conditions of detention such as: a lack of ventilation and light (see Torreggiani and Others, cited above, § 69; see also Babushkin v. Russia, no. 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007; Vlasov v. Russia, no. 78146/01, § 84, 12 June 2008; and Moiseyev v. Russia, no. 62936/00, §§ 124-27, 9 October 2008); limited access to outdoor exercise (see István Gábor Kovács v. Hungary, no. 15707/10, § 26, 17 January 2012) or a total lack of privacy in the cell (see Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 32 and 40-43, 2 June 2005; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 106-07, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007). - EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 16483/12
EGMR zum Umgang mit Flüchtlingen in Lampedusa - Die Würde des Menschen ist …
Aussi, même dans des affaires où chaque détenu disposait de 3 à 4 m², la Cour a conclu à la violation de l'article 3 dès lors que le manque d'espace s'accompagnait d'un manque de ventilation et de lumière (Torreggiani et autres, précité, § 69 ; voir également Babouchkine c. Russie, no 67253/01, § 44, 18 octobre 2007 ; Vlassov c. Russie, no 78146/01, § 84, 12 juin 2008 ; et Moisseiev, précité, §§ 124-127) ; d'un accès limité à la promenade en plein air (István Gábor Kovács c. Hongrie, no 15707/10, § 26, 17 janvier 2012) ou d'un manque total d'intimité dans les cellules (Novosselov c. Russie, no 66460/01, §§ 32 et 40-43, 2 juin 2005 ; Khoudoyorov c. Russie, no 6847/02, §§ 106-107, CEDH 2005-X (extraits) ; et Belevitski c. Russie, no 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1er mars 2007). - EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01
BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA
The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see, in particular, Mamedova, cited above, § 62 et seq.; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., 8 November 2005; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI).It has held that the practice of keeping defendants in detention without a specific legal basis or clear rules governing their situation - with the result that they may be deprived of their liberty for an unlimited period without judicial authorisation - was incompatible with the principles of legal certainty and the protection from arbitrariness, which are common threads throughout the Convention and the rule of law (see Korchuganova v. Russia, no. 75039/01, § 57, 8 June 2006; Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, §§ 67-68, 2 March 2006; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 146-148, ECHR 2005-...; Jecius, cited above, §§ 60-64, and Baranowski, cited above, §§ 53-58).
This is particularly true in the Russian legal system where the characterisation in law of the facts - and thus the sentence faced by the applicant - is determined by the prosecution without judicial review of the issue whether the evidence that has been obtained supports a reasonable suspicion that the applicant has committed the alleged offence (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 180, 8 November 2005).
- EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 43517/09
TORREGGIANI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Aussi, même dans des affaires où chaque détenu disposait de 3 à 4 m², la Cour a conclu à la violation de l'article 3 dès lors que le manque d'espace s'accompagnait d'un manque de ventilation et de lumière (Moisseiev c. Russie, no 62936/00, 9 octobre 2008 ; voir également Vlassov c. Russie, no 78146/01, § 84, 12 juin 2008 ; Babouchkine c. Russie, no 67253/01, § 44, 18 octobre 2007) ; d'un accès limité à la promenade en plein air (István Gábor Kovács c. Hongrie, no 15707/10, § 26, 17 janvier 2012) ou d'un manque total d'intimité dans les cellules (voir, mutatis mutandis, Belevitskiy c. Russie, no 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1er mars 2007 ; Khudoyorov c. Russie, no 6847/02, §§ 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extraits) ; et Novoselov c. Russie, no 66460/01, §§ 32 et 40-43, 2 juin 2005).Sensible à la vulnérabilité particulière des personnes se trouvant sous le contrôle exclusif des agents de l'État, telles les personnes détenues, la Cour réitère que la procédure prévue par la Convention ne se prête pas toujours à une application rigoureuse du principe affirmanti incumbit probatio (la preuve incombe à celui qui affirme) car, inévitablement, le gouvernement défendeur est parfois seul à avoir accès aux informations susceptibles de confirmer ou d'infirmer les affirmations du requérant (Khoudoyorov c. Russie, no 6847/02, § 113, CEDH 2005-X (extraits) ; et Benediktov c. Russie, no 106/02, § 34, 10 mai 2007 ; Brânduse c. Roumanie, no 6586/03, § 48, 7 avril 2009 ; Ananyev et autres c. Russie, précité, § 123).
- EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 49872/11
Julija Tymoschenko
The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 103, 28 March 2006; Visloguzov v. Ukraine, no. 32362/02, § 46, 20 May 2010; and Iglin v. Ukraine, no. 39908/05, § 52, 12 January 2012). - EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03
IDALOV c. RUSSIE
La Cour rappelle qu'elle a conclu à la violation de l'article 3 de la Convention dans un certain nombre d'affaires dirigées contre la Russie à raison des conditions d'exiguïté dans lesquelles les requérants avaient été détenus au tribunal et transportés vers et depuis ce lieu (voir, par exemple, Khoudoyorov c. Russie, no 6847/02, §§ 118-120, CEDH 2005-X ; et Starokadomski c. Russie, no 42239/02, §§ 53-60, 31 juillet 2008). - EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
SELEZNEV v. RUSSIA
Relevant international documents and reports concerning the conditions in Russian penitentiary establishments can be found in the judgment of 25 October 2005 in the case of Fedotov v. Russia, (no. 5140/02, §§ 54-55), judgment of 10 May 2007 in the case of Benediktov v. Russia, (no. 106/02, § 21) and judgment of 8 November 2005 in the case of Khudoyorov v. Russia (no. 6847/02, §§ 97-98).The Court has also refused to take into account an applicant's earlier periods of detention where his complaints mainly concerned the conditions of the most recent detention (see Khudoyorov v. Russia (dec.), no. 6847/02, 22 February 2005).
The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, cited above, § 39 et seq.; Kalashnikov v. Russia, cited above, § 97 et seq.; and Andrey Frolov v. Russia, no. 205/02, § 43 and seq., 29 March 2007, which also concerned detention facility.
- EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 38004/12
Mariya Alekhina u.a. ./. Russland - "Pussy Riot"-Urteil verletzt Meinungsfreiheit
- EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 13591/05
NAZAROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 20756/04
ISAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 29787/03
RIAD ET IDIAB c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 18255/10
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 22405/04
YEVGENIY BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13
MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 57180/09
BERNOBIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 62936/00
MOISEYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 8217/04
GUBIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2015 - 48416/09
KORKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 16262/05
ZUYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 42239/02
STAROKADOMSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 24650/02
GULIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.05.2008 - 67542/01
GUSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2014 - 14945/03
ARTEMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12
ADEN AHMED v. MALTA
- EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 29464/03
AREFYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05
MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
IACOV STANCIU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03
BYCHKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 3522/04
SALMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 17564/06
SADRETDINOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
ALEKSANDR NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 16264/05
VASILIY VASILYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38711/03
GOROSHCHENYA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.07.2008 - 3130/03
SUDARKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 44925/06
KLEYN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 64682/12
VASILESCU c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR - 41234/16 (anhängig)
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99
COBZARU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 22635/03
SULEJMANOVIC c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 67253/01
BABUSHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 36898/03
TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 66448/17
EGMR verurteilt Türkei: Haft von Ex-Richter verstößt gegen Menschenrechte
- EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03
TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 23190/17
PETRESCU c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5774/10
MANDIC AND JOVIC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 4493/04
LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 31535/09
GORBULYA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 2512/04
NOLAN AND K. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 6865/19
FEILAZOO v. MALTA
- EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 72508/13
MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 58165/10
KHUROSHVILI c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06
FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 75109/01
VIOREL BURZO c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 15217/07
ALEKSANDR MAKAROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 37048/04
GIORGI NIKOLAISHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 2570/04
KUCHERUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 16031/10
CARACET c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 17249/12
SZAFRANSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 22910/10
CHKHARTISHVILI c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 74279/10
LICA c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03
GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07
SOLDATENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 34458/03
POROWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 2653/13
YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 22015/10
VOICU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 01.08.2013 - 70427/11
HORSHILL c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 2889/09
TAGGATIDIS ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 35555/03
CIUPERCESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 11.10.2007 - 656/06
NASRULLOYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 37213/02
KANTYREV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 205/02
Menschenrechtsgericht rügt erneut Haftbedingungen in Russland
- EGMR, 06.10.2016 - 3342/11
RICHMOND YAW ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 15434/11
TELLISSI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 20197/03
MIMINOSHVILI v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 42371/02
PAVLENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 24981/07
VAFIADIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 48343/16
BIGOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 12.11.2015 - 41800/13
FILIPPOPOULOS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 18785/13
KOUTALIDIS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 22.04.2014 - 73869/10
G.C. c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 38623/03
PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02
ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 40523/08
PESA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 36110/03
MARIANA MARINESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 5962/03
MAKARENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.10.2009 - 8249/07
SHUVAEV c. GRECE
- EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 106/02
BENEDIKTOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 56660/12
KORNEYKOVA AND KORNEYKOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 6110/03
KUPTSOV AND KUPTSOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 3242/03
GLADKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 25664/05
LIND v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75039/01
KORCHUGANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06
MANSUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 61582/10
SOLODNIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 17494/16
PUKHACHEV AND ZARETSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 51249/11
ORAVEC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 15256/05
TCHANKOTADZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 446/10
PUGZLYS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 3048/04
RICCARDI v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 46793/06
BULDASHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 10816/10
LOKPO AND TOURE v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 29226/03
CREANGA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 67413/01
GULTYAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03
SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 78146/01
VLASOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 30779/04
PATSURIA v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 19.05.2016 - 37289/12
J.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 45175/08
SARA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 26436/05
KOLUNOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 29747/09
TSITSIRIGGOS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 59301/08
TINNER c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 921/03
BORDIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 1606/02
POPOV AND VOROBYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 30983/02
GRISHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 26627/05
KARIMBAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.07.2020 - 29760/15
LAUTARU ET SEED c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 21571/05
MINDADZE AND NEMSITSVERIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12
MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 41545/06
SEGEDA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 20824/09
PERICA OREB v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 44283/06
SAMARTSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
KULIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 61767/08
PYATKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 1600/09
KOROLEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2012 - 31720/02
TITARENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10
TONIOLO v. SAN MARINO AND ITALY
- EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 35648/04
MITROKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 43710/07
FETISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 57229/09
LONGA YONKEU v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 4512/09
POPANDOPULO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 41833/04
YEVGENIY ALEKSEYENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 4532/04
ROMOKHOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 71572/01
BAZJAKS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 7772/04
VLADIMIR KRIVONOSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 42255/04
NEDAYBORSHCH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 24202/05
VELIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 3449/05
HOKIC ET HRUSTIC c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 34393/03
PITALEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 24325/03
GENERALOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 36932/02
BAKHMUTSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 5269/02
TANASE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 22/03
GRIGORYEVSKIKH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 6954/02
MALTABAR AND MALTABAR v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 40774/02
SOLOVEY AND ZOZULYA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 17283/02
YELOYEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 18145/05
GIGOLASHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 3947/03
SILIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 22625/02
MIRONOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02
CORSACOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 17101/19
KUC v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 31623/17
BARDALI c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 18496/16
ESKERKHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 60272/09
RUPA AND TOMPI v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 42526/07
G. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 8026/04
YEGORYCHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05
SHKARUPA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 8067/12
LONIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 53812/10
SIGAREV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04
GONTA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 26.09.2013 - 24938/06
VITKOVSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 591/07
YEPISHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 24009/03
MAZALU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 918/02
SOLOVYEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 1900/04
GELD v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33619/04
SOKURENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 44068/07
POGHOSYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 31725/04
BADILA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 33123/08
SIZOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 38726/05
PELEVIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 1066/05
DOROGAYKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 891/05
KASHAVELOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 7782/04
KOVALEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 26127/03
VITRUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 13173/02
MUKHUTDINOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 44290/07
SABEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2010 - 69535/01
KOSITSYN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 29044/06
SHABANI c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08
ALEKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 14370/03
MOSKOVETS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 36941/02
GUBKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 11982/02
NOVINSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 28617/03
BELASHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 35231/02
SVERSHOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 30997/02
POLUFAKIN AND CHERNYSHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 26386/02
FURSENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 63955/00
SUKHOVOY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 37810/03
BAGEL v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 11287/03
LELIEVRE c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 15825/06
YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 59287/18
SIDORETS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 1354/19
GROMOV AND BARBOLIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 15007/19
KASHIN AND PETKYAVICHUS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 54500/18
SMETANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 75645/14
KOLBAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 71295/17
CHUDINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 39095/17
PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 72087/17
STUGAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 77444/17
STOLBOVSKIKH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 4806/18
BAKHAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 53624/18
PIDGURSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 33120/08
BRESHCHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 21205/12
BOBRYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 67485/17
R.R. AND A.R. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 45852/17
ISMAILOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 83594/17
GEDZHADZE v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 12030/16
MIRAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 9094/05
BAYKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2018 - 34473/05
TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 55418/15
MARAGGOS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 5855/09
PUZRINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 50932/16
STUCHILOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 56110/09
KLEMENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 47230/11
BOGOSYAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 61998/15
M.S. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 22935/10
ZVYAGIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 33071/12
SAYEROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 9237/14
MYALICHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 22965/06
ZHULIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 52160/13
MOXAMED ISMAACIIL AND ABDIRAHMAN WARSAME v. MALTA
- EGMR, 12.11.2015 - 40288/06
NAIMDZHON YAKUBOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 6277/06
LYUBUSHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.09.2015 - 13008/13
KOVYAZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 25381/12
GRUJOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 33803/04
MIKHALCHUK c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 39682/09
ANNINOS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 45353/05
FATIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 48982/08
YURIY RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10
GAYDUKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.04.2014 - 37858/08
ZENKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 27498/06
ZHIZHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 19730/10
TOMA BARBU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 43808/07
LUKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
MAKSIM PETROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 29985/05
KISLITSA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 29448/05
RAZHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 41716/08
VALERIY KOVALENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 2366/07
SUSLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 41558/05
GLOTOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 6479/05
YEVGENIY KUZMIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 22921/05
MUKHAREV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 17628/03
SYNGAYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 31244/06
LOVEIKA v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 39602/05
FEDORENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 41550/02
GADAMAURI AND KADYRBEKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 20641/04
CHUDUN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 49905/07
SUPUT v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 20326/04
VADIM KOVALEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 22475/05
DOLGOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 8609/04
SVETLANA KAZMINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30251/03
ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 4320/05
POLOVINKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 21731/03
SAMOSHENKOV AND STROKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.07.2010 - 14797/02
ALEKSANDR MATVEYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 23939/02
SHCHERBAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 38031/04
SHULENKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 9807/02
OVCHINNIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 21503/04
VLADIMIR KOZLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 5453/08
YURIY YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 43589/02
SALAKHUTDINOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 4871/03
SKOROBOGATYKH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 17679/03
BUZHINAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 25333/03
PETER c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 7739/06
SOROKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 16854/03
TSARKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 6270/06
LYUBIMENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 34000/02
IGOR IVANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 28957/02
PSHEVECHERSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 1886/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 724/18
MUMANZHINOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 82206/17
AKIROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 27603/15
JATSÕSÕN v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 48749/16
VNUCHKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.09.2016 - 1574/06
SAVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 15172/07
KONYGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 30468/07
MALAKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 63727/11
ANDREY YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 35644/08
KIRSANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 18675/09
S.M. c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 19936/04
VALERIY LOPATA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 27843/11
NIYAZOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 60045/10
KOZHAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 9643/03
GOH v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 14569/05
SARIGIANNIS c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 25432/05
SKACHKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 27672/03
BURYAGA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 42998/08
HADI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 35411/05
PETR PONOMAREV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 13541/06
SHKILEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.02.2009 - 42443/02
EMINBEYLI v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 13476/04
KHUDYAKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 14850/03
MATYUSH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 40008/04
GALUASHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 67086/01
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 10917/06
LAVRICHENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12
ORLOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 9536/10
FEDORIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 34180/08
GONTMAKHER v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 68495/12
PACULA c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 58104/08
SIZOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
ADEMOVIC v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 4176/03
DANILIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 41169/02
KONONOVICH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 16447/04
NIKOLAY KUCHERENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 42812/11
AZIMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2018 - 31113/15
NIKOLAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 55477/10
KAVALEROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 59813/09
LAZAREV AND BEKTASHYANTS v. RUSSIA