Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHODORKOVSKIY v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 7, Art. 8, Art. 18, Art. 34, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 11082/06
• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 27618/95

  PESTI AND FRODL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 11082/06

  27618/95 and 27619/95, 18 January 2000; Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, §§ 96 et seq., ECHR 2001-II), but not the "fairness" of the appeal proceedings, which is within the realm of Article 6 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96

  Dieter Krombach

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 11082/06

  27618/95 and 27619/95, 18 January 2000; Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, §§ 96 et seq., ECHR 2001-II), but not the "fairness" of the appeal proceedings, which is within the realm of Article 6 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 44759/98

  Verletzung des Rechts auf ein faires Verfahren durch überlange Verfahrensdauer; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 11082/06

  Referring to the case of Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC] (no. 44759/98, ECHR 2001-VII), the Government submitted that "tax matters still form part of the hard core of public-authority prerogatives, with the public nature of the relationship between the taxpayer and the community remaining predominant" (§ 29).

 
• EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02

  CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 11082/06

  As to the Government's formal objection, the Court reiterates that complaints lodged under the second sentence of Article 34 do not give rise to any issue of admissibility, including exhaustion of domestic remedies, under the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 105, Reports 1998-IV; Shamayev, Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 507, ECHR 2005-III; and Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad v. Germany (dec.), no. 35865/03, 20 February 2007).
• EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 35865/03

  Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 11082/06

  As to the Government's formal objection, the Court reiterates that complaints lodged under the second sentence of Article 34 do not give rise to any issue of admissibility, including exhaustion of domestic remedies, under the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 105, Reports 1998-IV; Shamayev, Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 507, ECHR 2005-III; and Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad v. Germany (dec.), no. 35865/03, 20 February 2007).
• EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

  POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 11082/06

  The Court recalls that "a waiver must, if it is to be effective for Convention purposes, be established in an unequivocal manner and be attended by minimum safeguards commensurate with its importance (see Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 31, Series A no. 277-A).