Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZELE v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Zele v. Slovenia

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 20965/03

  RIBIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  For relevant domestic law see judgment Ribic v. Slovenia (no. 20965/03, 19 October 2010, § 19).

  Nor is it inadmissible on any other grounds (see Ribic v. Slovenia, no. 20965/03, 19 October 2010, §§ 37-42).

• EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98

  WIERCISZEWSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  That deficiency is attributable to the authorities, not the applicant (see Wierciszewska v. Poland, no. 41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003, and Matica v. Romania, no. 19567/02, § 24, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 1438/02

  DEZELAK v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  Nonetheless, as it has already stressed in previous cases (see, for example, Dezelak v. Slovenia, no. 1438/02, § 25, 6 April 2006), since the remittal of cases for re-examination is usually ordered as a result of errors committed by lower courts, as indeed appears to have happened in the applicant's case, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings discloses a serious deficiency in the judicial system.

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 42274/02

  BIZJAK JAGODIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  Having regard to the above and its case-law on the subject (see, Jesic v. Slovenia, no. 38341/02, §§ 17-19, 27 April 2006; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006, Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006 and Umek v. Slovenia, no. 35463/02, 8 January 2009, §§ 44-47) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 38341/02

  JESIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  Having regard to the above and its case-law on the subject (see, Jesic v. Slovenia, no. 38341/02, §§ 17-19, 27 April 2006; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006, Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006 and Umek v. Slovenia, no. 35463/02, 8 January 2009, §§ 44-47) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 38528/02

  RODIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  Having regard to the above and its case-law on the subject (see, Jesic v. Slovenia, no. 38341/02, §§ 17-19, 27 April 2006; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006, Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006 and Umek v. Slovenia, no. 35463/02, 8 January 2009, §§ 44-47) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 19567/02

  MATICA v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  That deficiency is attributable to the authorities, not the applicant (see Wierciszewska v. Poland, no. 41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003, and Matica v. Romania, no. 19567/02, § 24, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 35463/02

  UMEK v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  Having regard to the above and its case-law on the subject (see, Jesic v. Slovenia, no. 38341/02, §§ 17-19, 27 April 2006; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006, Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006 and Umek v. Slovenia, no. 35463/02, 8 January 2009, §§ 44-47) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 for a case to be heard within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 29.03.1989 - 11118/84

  BOCK v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 21308/06

  The Court acknowledges that the domestic courts were in the best position to judge whether the case ought to be referred back to the lower courts under the relevant provision of domestic law (Bock v. Germany, judgment of 29 March 1989, Series A no. 150, § 43).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE