Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MALLIAKOU AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MALLIAKOU AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79

  BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 78005/11

  It is well-established case-law that the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 must be construed in the light of the principle laid down in the first sentence of the Article (see, among other authorities, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 134, ECHR 2004-V; and Brosset-Triboulet and Others v. France [GC], no. 34078/02, § 80, 29 March 2010).
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

  CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 78005/11

  In determining whether this requirement is met, the Court recognises that the State enjoys a wide margin of appreciation with regard both to choosing the means of enforcement and to ascertaining whether the consequences of enforcement are justified in the general interest for the purpose of achieving the object of the law in question (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94 and 2 others, § 75, ECHR 1999-III; Schneider v. Luxembourg, no. 2113/04, § 45, 10 July 2007; and Depalle v. France [GC], no. 34044/02, § 83, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 78005/11

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed, in accordance with well-established case-law, in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 143, ECHR 2016 (extracts); and Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece, no. 50973/08, 21 December 2010).

 
• EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 2998/08

  PARATHERISTIKOS OIKODOMIKOS SYNETAIRISMOS STEGASEOS YPALLILON TRAPEZIS TIS …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 78005/11

  Having regard to the above, the Court is not convinced that the applicants exploited the quarry in a manner which was unobstructed or that the administration gave them the legitimate expectation that they could continue operating the quarry (compare Paratheristikos Oikodomikos Synetairismos Stegaseos Ypallilon Trapezis Tis Ellados v. Greece (just satisfaction), no. 2998/08, § 22, 29 January 2013).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 78005/11

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III), even though the Court should have regard to the fact that an applicant has been a party to domestic proceedings (see Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 47, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 72377/01

  SARL DU PARC D'ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 78005/11

  The word "victim", in the context of Article 34 of the Convention, denotes the person or persons directly or indirectly affected by the alleged violation (see Sarl du Parc d'Activités de Blotzheim v. France, no. 72377/01, § 20, 11 July 2006).