Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

  Inadmissible (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive ...

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  That notwithstanding, the Court has consistently held that the absence of an intention to humiliate or debase a detainee by placing him or her in poor conditions, while being a factor to be taken into account, does not conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no. 41035/98, § 63, 18 January 2005).

  Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 117 and 229, Torregiani and Others, cited above, § 78, Vasilescu, cited above, § 105, Neshkov and Others, cited above, § 184, and Varga and Others, cited above, §§ 56 and 59. In the light of this case-law, whose origin goes back to Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, the approach of the Lithuanian courts is incorrect (see paragraphs 27, 49 and 59 of the judgment).

• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  Moreover, the level of persuasion necessary for reaching a particular conclusion and, in this connection, the distribution of the burden of proof are intrinsically linked to the specificity of the facts, the nature of the allegation made and the Convention right at stake (see, among others, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 26, ECHR 2004-VII).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  The Court has accepted this test since Dougoz v. Greece (no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II) and has repeatedly held that overcrowding may be aggravated by other prison conditions (for example, Orchowski, cited above, §§ 132-135, Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 142 and 151, Vasilescu, cited above, §§ 101-104, Neshkov and Others, cited above, § 235, and Varga and Others, cited above, §§ 72, 78, 89-92).

 
• EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

  KEHAYOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  That notwithstanding, the Court has consistently held that the absence of an intention to humiliate or debase a detainee by placing him or her in poor conditions, while being a factor to be taken into account, does not conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no. 41035/98, § 63, 18 January 2005).
• EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 50765/99

  TODOR TODOROV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  The extremely dire situation of dormitory no. 2 at the Alytus Correctional Home has been confirmed by the CPT (see points 36 and 47 of the CPT report, cited in paragraph 67 above), whose findings may therefore inform the Court's assessment (see Todor Todorov v. Bulgaria, no. 50765/99, § 47, 5 April 2007).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).".
• EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 8217/04

  GUBIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).".

• EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 39412/19

  POLGAR c. ROUMANIE

  Dès lors, il en résulte que le requérant n'a pas obtenu un redressement adéquat et suffisant pour la violation qu'il a subie (voir, mutatis mutandis, Mironovas et autres c. Lituanie, nos 40828/12 et 6 autres, §§ 99-100, 8 décembre 2015).
• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 8797/16

  TAMASAUSKAS AND RADZEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  For the relevant domestic law and practice and international materials, including reports on the conditions in ? iauliai Remand Prison and Alytus Correctional Facility at the material time, see Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania (nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, §§ 50-69, 8 December 2015).

  The Court refers to the general principles stemming from its case-law and to its earlier findings (see Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, §§ 84-88 and 93-94, 8 December 2015).

• EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 40091/13

  BILINSKAS v. LITHUANIA

  The relevant provisions of domestic law are resumed in Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania (nos. 40828/12, 29292/12, 69598/12, 40163/13, 66281/13, 70048/13 and 70065/13, §§ 50-55, 8 December 2015).

  The Court observes that the principles governing the assessment of an applicant's victim status are summarised in paragraphs 178-192 of its judgment in the case of Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) ([GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V), and paragraphs 84-85 of its judgment in the case of Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania (nos. 40828/12, 29292/12, 69598/12, 40163/13, 66281/13, 70048/13 and 70065/13, 8 December 2015).

 
• EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 23190/17

  PETRESCU c. PORTUGAL

  Cela étant, elle observe relativement à la question de l'effectivité des recours qu'il ne peut pas rendre de décisions contraignantes (paragraphe 34 ci-dessus) et qu'il a le pouvoir non pas de prononcer des injonctions à l'encontre de l'administration mais uniquement de formuler des recommandations (Mandic et Jovic c. Slovénie, nos 5774/10 et 5985/10, § 117, 20 octobre 2011, Ananyev et autres, précité, §§ 105-106, et Mironovas et autres c. Lituanie, nos 40828/12 et 6 autres, §§ 107-109, 8 décembre 2015 ; voir, a contrario, Sakin c. Turquie (déc.), no 20616/13, § 33, 28 juin 2016).
• EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 35614/19

  ILERDE AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE

  In any event, the Court observes that where the nature of overcrowding stems from a systemic issue and authorities are faced with a large number of simultaneous requests, measures which assist only individual complainants at the expense and to the detriment of other detainees, rather than addressing the system as a whole, may not be considered effective (see, mutatis mutandis, Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 111; Varga and Others v. Hungary, nos. 14097/12 and 5 others, § 63, 10 March 2015; Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, § 104, 8 December 2015; and Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517/09 and 6 others, § 54, 8 January 2013; compare and contrast Stella and Others v. Italy (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 8530/08

  VOLINTIRU c. ITALIE

  Dans certaines affaires, de telles allégations d'hygiène défaillante concernaient l'hôpital d'une prison (voir, par exemple, Mironovas et autres c. Lituanie, nos 40828/12 et 6 autres, §§ 127 et 128, 8 décembre 2015) ou un hôpital psychiatrique où les requérants étaient soumis à un traitement forcé (Stanev, précité, § 209 et Sabeva c. Bulgarie, no 44290/07, 10 juin 2010).
• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20

  EINIKIS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

  Accordingly, the Court finds that the five applicants retain their victim status under Article 34 of the Convention (see Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, §§ 99-100, 8 December 2015).
• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 17774/20

  OZAROVSKIJ AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

  However, the Court has consistently held that anyone who has been detained in inhuman or degrading conditions must be able to claim compensation (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 228, 10 January 2012; Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925/10 and 5 others, § 190, 27 January 2015; and Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, §§ 93-94, 8 December 2015).
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 25059/20

  LUKOSIN v. LITHUANIA

  However, the Court has consistently held that anyone who has been detained in inhuman or degrading conditions must be able to claim compensation (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 228, 10 January 2012; Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925/10 and 5 others, § 190, 27 January 2015; and Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, §§ 93-94, 8 December 2015).