Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 5317/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,43219) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SNOPKO v. SLOVAKIA
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 25951/06
KOMAR v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 5317/14
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 25763/02
RAPOS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 5317/14
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 23865/03
BIC v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 5317/14
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 5317/14
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration carefully in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 5317/14
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010).
- VG Stuttgart, 20.04.2016 - A 13 K 5316/14 Mit Beschluss vom 16.12.2014 wurde durch das erkennende Gericht die aufschiebende Wirkung der Klage der Klägerin zu 1 angeordnet (13 K 5317/14).
Wegen weiterer Einzelheiten wird auf die Gerichtsakte und die zur Sache gehörende Akte der Beklagten (Az. 5744226 - 144) sowie die Gerichtsakte in dem Verfahren A 13 K 5317/14 (vorläufiger Rechtsschutz) Bezug genommen.