Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PELESHOK v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PELESHOK v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

  DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  The Court reiterates that an applicant will be deprived of the status of "victim" where the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and then afforded appropriate redress for it (see Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  The Court reiterates that, according to its well-established case-law, Article 3 of the Convention gives rise to a procedural obligation to conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 78, 10 January 2012; and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 59, 31 July 2012).
• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00

  MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  The minimum standards of effectiveness laid down by the Court's case-law include the requirements that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see, mutatis mutandis, Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III).

 
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  However, whatever method of investigation is selected, the authorities must act as soon as an official complaint has been lodged (see, mutatis mutandis, Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 31143/96

  INDELICATO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  Further, in cases under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention where the effectiveness of the official investigation has been at issue, the Court has often given consideration to delays in the opening of investigations and taking of statements (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tekin v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 67, Reports 1998-IV) and the length of the preliminary investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  However, whatever method of investigation is selected, the authorities must act as soon as an official complaint has been lodged (see, mutatis mutandis, Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 32662/06

  BISER KOSTOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  The Court reiterates that, according to its well-established case-law, Article 3 of the Convention gives rise to a procedural obligation to conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 78, 10 January 2012; and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 59, 31 July 2012).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  Further, in cases under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention where the effectiveness of the official investigation has been at issue, the Court has often given consideration to delays in the opening of investigations and taking of statements (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tekin v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 67, Reports 1998-IV) and the length of the preliminary investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001).
• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 37246/06

  MUTA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  The Court reiterates that, according to its well-established case-law, Article 3 of the Convention gives rise to a procedural obligation to conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 78, 10 January 2012; and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 59, 31 July 2012).