Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 25397/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 25397/09
According to the long-standing case-law of the Court, the authorities must take into account the particularly vulnerable situation of victims and the fact that people who have been subjected to serious ill-treatment will often be less ready or willing to make a complaint (see, for instance, Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV).The Court reiterates in this context that, even when strictly speaking no complaint has been made, an investigation into allegations of ill-treatment must be started if there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment has been used (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
- EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 25397/09
According to the long-standing case-law of the Court, the authorities must take into account the particularly vulnerable situation of victims and the fact that people who have been subjected to serious ill-treatment will often be less ready or willing to make a complaint (see, for instance, Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV).The Court reiterates in this context that, even when strictly speaking no complaint has been made, an investigation into allegations of ill-treatment must be started if there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment has been used (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
- EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 25397/09
Further factors include the purpose for which the ill-treatment was inflicted, together with the intention or motivation behind it (compare, inter alia, Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996-VI; Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004; Gäfgen, cited above, § 88; and El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, § 196, ECHR 2012), although the absence of an intention to humiliate or debase the victim cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see, among other authorities, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX, and Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 114). - EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10
Transnistrien
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 25397/09
At the same time, it is only in exceptional circumstances that physical ill-treatment by State agents which does not result in death may disclose a violation of Article 2 of the Convention (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 51, ECHR 2004-XI, and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, § 173, 23 February 2016). - EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 18419/13
HOVHANNISYAN v. ARMENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 25397/09
As with an investigation under Article 2, such an investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and - if appropriate - punishment of those responsible (see Hovhannisyan v. Armenia, no. 18419/13, § 51, 19 July 2018).
- EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 44592/16
BOBOC AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
On 1 June 2009 one such witness (D., see D. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 25397/09, 8 December 2020) declared that she had seen Mr Boboc being beaten in the central square by several officers, both uniformed and plain-clothed.