Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 41827/02   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2007,64407
EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 41827/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,64407)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.01.2007 - 41827/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,64407)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. Januar 2007 - 41827/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,64407)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,64407) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (14)

  • EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 38004/12

    Mariya Alekhina u.a. ./. Russland - "Pussy Riot"-Urteil verletzt Meinungsfreiheit

    It did not specify which particular elements of the videos were problematic so as to bring them within the scope of the provisions of section 1(1) of the Suppression of Extremism Act it referred to in the decision (see Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 36, 9 January 2007, and Terentyev v. Russia, no. 25147/09, § 22, 26 January 2017).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2017 - 25147/09

    TERENTYEV v. RUSSIA

    In particular, the courts did not specify which elements of the impugned publication were problematic (see Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 36, 9 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 37986/09

    RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA (No. 3)

    The Court considers that by failing to examine the above-mentioned elements of the case the domestic courts cannot be said to have "applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10" or to have "based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts" (see Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 38, 9 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 1413/08

    Verstoß gegen Religions- und Meinungsfreiheit: russisches Verbot von islamischen

    In particular, it did not specify which passages of the books it considered problematic and in what way they incited religious discord or proclaimed people's superiority or deficiency on the basis of their attitude to religion (see, for similar reasoning, Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, §§ 36-38, 9 January 2007; and compare and contrast Soulas and Others v. France, no. 15948/03, § 43, 10 July 2008).
  • EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 9103/04

    "Partei Labour Georgien" ./. Georgien

    The Court does not rule out that the applicant party, as a legal entity (see Russian Conservative Party of Entrepreneurs and Others, cited above, § 102, and Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 52, 9 January 2007), might have suffered some non-pecuniary damage on account of the disfranchisement of the Khulo and Kobuleti voters.
  • EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 42864/05

    TIMPUL INFO-MAGAZIN AND ANGHEL v. MOLDOVA

    In particular, in Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova (no. 41827/02, 9 January 2007), EUR 8, 000 had been awarded and the penalty imposed on the applicant in that case had been much harsher (the closing of the newspaper) compared to the fine in the present case.
  • EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 11867/09

    SOLTÉSZ v. SLOVAKIA

    The Court considers that by failing to examine these elements of the case, the domestic courts cannot be said to have "applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10" or to have "based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts" (see Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 38, 9 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 41262/05

    RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA

    The Court considers that by failing to examine these elements of the case, the domestic courts cannot be said to have "applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10" and to have "based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts" (see Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 38, 9 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 35090/07

    RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA

    Finally, the Court notes that the present case raises no issue of a failure by the domestic courts to examine the case under "standards which [are] in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10" and to "bas[e] themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts" (see, by contrast, Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 38, 9 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 21666/09

    RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA (No. 2)

    Therefore, the Court is of the view that by failing to examine the elements of the case necessary for the assessment of the applicant company's compliance with its "duties and responsibilities" under Article 10 of the Convention, the domestic courts cannot be said to have "applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in [that provision]" or to have "based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts" (see Kommersant Moldovy v. Moldova, no. 41827/02, § 38, 9 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 6875/05

    SAYGILI AND KARATAS v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 28702/03

    FLUX v. MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

    FLUX AND SAMSON v. MOLDOVA

  • EGMR - 73328/17 (anhängig)

    VELITOV v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht