Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  UOTI v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - reserved Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 61222/00
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 61222/00

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 61222/00

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 61222/00

  The redress that has been, or may in the future be, offered is therefore inchoate (see, mutatis mutandis, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 121, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 26.06.2001 - 26390/95

  BECK v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 61222/00

  However, this general rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see Eckle v. Germany, cited above, § 66, Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, § 27, 26 June 2001, and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 77, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 61222/00

  The Court recalls that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (see Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66; for the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238 at § 34, and Schlader v. Austria (dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 61222/00

  The Court recalls that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (see Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66; for the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238 at § 34, and Schlader v. Austria (dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000).

• EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 35232/11

  PIRTTIMÄKI v. FINLAND

  It can therefore be said that the District Court afforded the applicant express and quantifiable redress for the breach of the reasonable time requirement (see Beck v. Norway, cited above, §§ 27-29; see also Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X; and Uoti v. Finland, no. 61222/00, § 30, 9 January 2007).
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48059/06

  DIMITROV AND HAMANOV v. BULGARIA

  The reduction of Mr Hamanov's sentence by the first-instance court could not remedy any delays that occurred later, when the case was heard on appeal (see Uoti v. Finland, no. 61222/00, § 31, 9 January 2007).