Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,43
EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,43)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.01.2014 - 66583/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,43)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. Januar 2014 - 66583/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,43)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,43) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

    Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    However, even in the absence of these, where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for or diminishing his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III, with further references).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

    POPOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure of deprivation of liberty do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla, cited above, §§ 92-94, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

    KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The Court reiterates in this regard that even though Article 3 does not entitle a detainee to be released "on compassionate grounds", it has always interpreted the requirement to secure the health and well-being of detainees, among other things, as an obligation on the part of the State to provide detainees with the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 01.09.2016 - 62303/13

    Bayerns Justiz verletzte Menschenrechte

    Sollten in der Frage, welche Behandlung zur angemessenen Gewährleistung der Gesundheit eines Gefangenen notwendig ist, die Meinungen der Ärzte auseinandergehen, kann es erforderlich sein, dass die innerstaatlichen Behörden und Gerichte zusätzlichen Rat eines spezialisierten medizinischen Sachverständigen einholen, um ihrer positiven Verpflichtung aus Artikel 3 nachzukommen (vgl. Xiros, a. a. O., Rdnrn. 87 und 89-90; und Budanov./. Russland, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 66583/11, Rdnr. 73, 9. Januar 2014).
  • EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 18785/13

    KOUTALIDIS c. GRÈCE

    En outre, la Cour rappelle que, en principe, le manque de soins médicaux appropriés peut constituer un traitement contraire à l'article 3 (Ä°lhan c. Turquie [GC], no 22277/93, § 87, CEDH 2000-VII, Gennadiy Naoumenko c. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 112, 10 février 2004, Gurenko c. Russie, no 41828/10, 5 février 2013, Bubnov c. Russie, no 76317/11, 5 février 2013, Budanov c. Russie, no 66583/11, 9 janvier 2014, et Gorelov c. Russie, no 49072/11, 9 janvier 2014).
  • EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 55025/17

    AKHPOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), as well as to the amount of the compensation awarded at the domestic level to the applicant in application no. 49006/19, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 2556/18

    PISAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 69591/17

    YERUSLANOV v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicant's claim for just satisfaction.
  • EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 17492/16

    NUSALOVA AND LYAPIN v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 79688/16

    CHERNOUSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 29389/19

    YEPIKHIN v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17

    KOZIN v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 82816/17

    BANCHILA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table to the remaining applicants.
  • EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 71325/16

    KALMYKOV v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht