Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.01.2020 - 52571/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,36) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SIYANKO v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SIYANKO v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2020 - 52571/11
The Court reiterates that allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 50541/08
Aufschub des Rechts auf Verteidigerbeistand (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2020 - 52571/11
The Court clarified the general principles to be applied with regard to a restriction on the right of access to a lawyer and concerning the fairness of proceedings in Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09, §§ 257-65, ECHR 2016) and Simeonovi v. Bulgaria ([GC], no. 21980/04, §§ 112-20, CEDH 2017 (extracts), with further references); it confirmed those principles recently in Beuze v. Belgium ([GC], no. 71409/10, §§ 119-50, 9 November 2018).
- EGMR - 8838/20 (anhängig)
ALAKHVERDYAN v. UKRAINE and 1 other application
By judgments of 6 April 2019 and 9 February 2020 the Court found violations of Article 6 § 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention in the applicants' cases (Alakhverdyan v. Ukraine (Committee), application no. 12224/09 and Siyanko c. Ukraine, application no. 52571/11) on account of the restriction of the applicants' right to defence in the criminal proceedings against them; it also ruled that the overall fairness of those proceedings had been prejudiced.